georgiaroberts-73669 Unlike other adaptations that focus solely on the Victorian era, this gives a more modern twist on the classic tale of Jane Eyre. I feel like this is exactly what I saw in my head as I read the novel. Mia Wasikowska's performance is superb, she embodies all of the characteristics I associate with Jane. The fire scene (my favourite in the novel) between her and Michael Fassbender is captivating and real. The gothic element of the novel is also widely explored and showcased especially in this adaptation which I love because it's such a huge theme of the novel, which isn't as explored as much in the other films where they usually focus on the Romance theme. Love love love

screaming lady I was enraptured from the moment Edward Rochester fell from his horse. Truly, there is no movie to match this adaptation of 'Jane Eyre'- the grouchiness and depth is so true to the book that I could not help but feel the temptation to run across the moors with the measly little governess as Rochester cried 'JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANE!". Secondhand embarrassment washed over me like rain as the couple wed in the dreary church, the priest smiling weakly and attempting to join the hands that were destined to touch. I say this to try and convey how realistic each scene is to the viewer. As for the cast, Rochester may not be as passionate as he was in the novel, but he certainly is dark and grumpy enough to pull off the 'Byronic hero vibe'.If you want to feel the essence of Rochester shine from within, I highly recommend this delicate and accurate portrayal of 'Jane Eyre'.

Prismark10 This film adaptation of Jane Eyre is told in flashbacks but looks like a stripped down version of the story.Mia Wasikowska looks plain and innocent enough as a governess for the daughter of a wealthy man. Michael Fassbender oozes broodiness as Rochester, the father of the child but he hides a deep secret and sadness.Rochester tentatively falls for Jane and asks her to marry him. Jane is confused and hesitant but agrees however during the wedding ceremony, Rochester's dark secret is revealed.I reckon the film could had done without the flashbacks and told in a more straightforward manner. The period setting is suitably sparse and bleak which is certainly in keeping with the underlying theme of the story.The film is not entirely successful, it never clicks until Fassbender arrives as the craggy, rude and abrupt Rochester. I did not feel it was cinematic enough. A BBC film that was better suited for the small screen.

Pragha Kanthakumar Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre provides a catharsis for love and romance in its pure and concentrated form. It is nearly impossible to portray it fully in a movie of 2 hours. Cary Fukunaga (The Director) has done a very good job considering these difficulties.The casting of Mia Wasikowska (Jane Eyre) and Michael Fassbender (Edward Rochester) are appropriate. Mia's subtle expressions of yearning, love and despair are beautiful. I cannot think of a better actress than Mia to play the role of Jane Eyre. Though Michael Fassbender does not fit Brontë's description of a manly and not-so- handsome figure, he does a perfect portrayal of Rochester's character otherwise. Jamie Bell's performance seems to be dwarfed by the acting of the two lead actors, which is otherwise a decent performance.The ending of the movie, in my opinion was a bit abrupt – considering the way it is narrated in the novel.Overall this movie is one of the best adaptations of classical literature I have seen.10 out of 10.