Sam AlMan
Well, when I watched Jack and Jill the first time.. it was strange to me and it was cringe worthy but then I found my self laugh at some parts and can't believe that Adam Sandler would make of it a real comedy movie.. it is absolutely a real silly comedy movie just wrapped so it holds a meaning at the end.It hold exaggerated variety of characters that you "may" laugh at their actions, you will see big and well known names act in this movie in weird parts but still I didn't fell I wasted my time. This movie just to be rented for a laugh at silly things happen! .. there are so many parody movies that they are supposed to be funny but they could not pull a smile from me more than this one (which is not basically a parody movie!).
nathano-54375
It's sort of a meh situation, being all kind of bland in a way (I'll let you to think about how). The acting wasn't great either, everyone's been asking how they talk to each other when they're both on screen, it's either played by the same character with a green screen and a voice actor or it's been done by two different guys, them both looking similar, it's most likely just an actor and the green screen though.
glafournie
First off, I would like you all to know that I am a kid, and I thought this was a great movie! So, why all of the bad ratings?Jack and Jill is one of the funniest movies that I have ever seen. I love that Adam Sandler is playing both Jack ad his twin sister, Jill. I thought that he did very well on both parts. Now, I can tell by the reviews that adults do not enjoy this movie. but please! Show it to your kids! They'll love it, just as I did. Some of the humor is slightly gross, and there are one or two slightly inappropriate parts, which is why my rating isn't a 10. Another reason is because I thought having Al Pacino in it was a bit odd, but that is just my opinion.I would show this movie to your kids, and I rate this 7/10.
Oliver Thatcher Watson
I think it's at this point where Adam Sandler has stopped trying. With a poorly written and mean-spirited story, bad script, cringey acting, painfully unfunny settings, and an unfortunate waste of a good performance from Al Pacino, there's almost nothing about this film that is good in the very slightest. It is an absolute cringe-fest that doesn't have enough to impress anybody. It is beyond me how Al Pacino thought this film would be any good enough to be in it. What's depressing is that his performance, which actually wasn't bad in this film, could have been used in something else, instead of absolute garbage like this. I recommend to just avoid this film at all costs, as it's not worth wasting an hour and a half of your life cringing at a poorly acted, stupid, bad premised film that won't do anything but depress those who are fans of Al Pacino.