Al Carilli How on earth can this crapfest be currently averaging 7.3/10?Seriously, IMDb's reputation is damaged beyond repair if garbage like this achieves such a high score, causing those who still trust the site to waste their time and money sitting through such an inane and pointless excuse of a movie.So the production team summoned all their friends and relatives, urging them to clog IMDb with their 10/10 ratings, betraying those of us who actually care about honest recommendations.Gaming the system this way is only hurting the art of cinematography.Pathetic.

Jacques Du Rand I completely understand the frustration and the sense of feeling lost most people have experienced with this film. It is not going to be everybody's cup of tea and I would almost dare say this is a film made for a film student to analyze. Identicals, not very aptly titled, is like a slow hand that keeps testing your borders as a viewer with its sensual cinematography and a very intense focused story-line that plays away from the usual action based plot lines, but rather becomes a cat and mouse of reactions. It sits very difficult from a psychological point of view since it uses very subtle nuances in film making to keep the viewer feeling uncomfortable and I think this discomfort has probably been experienced by many to be "boredom". We are uncertain throughout who is the cat and who is the mouse while the story unfolds and the two main players keep pushing back and forth testing boundaries and trying to find each other's " you" factor. It is The Nines (2007) meets Melancholia (2011) meets Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004). Far from perfect, I felt that this was a story that could have either be told as a short film in 30 minutes or that left a lot of room for additional story creation, yet at the same time's it's slow pace and sad melancholy allows for the very deep complex and delicate themes to work its way down and make it a little bit easier to ease into it. Bottom-line is that here we have a C-story-line that is being told as an A-story-line with all the emotional subtleties and the quiet/slow timing that a C-story-line require. Definitely an existential film that questions the process of reinvention of the self and the how much control you have given the influence of external factors (including your own addictions – aka addiction to another person) and co-dependency on a certain reality that you have come to depend upon as "real". The film's biggest flaw is that it was classified as a Science Fiction rather than Experimental or Surreal. While watching I was reminded of the firs translation I ever read of Jules Verne's Journey to the Centre of the Earth, which has been seen as the first Science Fiction novel ever written. Also, similar to this film, it lacked a definitely story definition, but rather presented the "experience of" a certain journey. I would, for myself, give this film an 9 star rating, but down this to 7, because I think that in presentation, it does not allow itself to reach as wide an audience as it could.

charles000 Apparently, some reviewers may seem to think this is some sort of techno futurist art statement film piece, probing an uncharted realm suggested by parallel existence pathways in an emergent world.But wait . . .Before heralding this latest film as probing new uncharted territory, not so fast.Much of this same concept was remarkably well done (much better than via "Identicals" in various ways, at least in my opinion), in the Rock Hudson film "Seconds", circa 1966.Identicals does deserve some credit for its stylistic motif, a uniquely strange mix of future and retro tech ambiance, and the lovely Nora-Jane No one is quite fun to watch as Nadia . . . but still, this film just doesn't quite fit all the pieces together well enough to deliver its entire message coherently.I certainly don't mind the time spent to watch this, as visually and aesthetically it's an interesting bit of filmcraft, but this could have been so much more, like a seed planted promising a magnificent flower, but ever quite reaching full blossom.

villageiowa So some of the big questions are never answered, like why did they come to take his girlfriend in the first place. Then, after the replacement girlfriend died, why didn't they abort the mission and leave the real girlfriend there. And why these abductors choose such a bad time to abduct, couldn't they have pulled her off the street into a van, no, they show up at the house, hoping that the girlfriend answers the door, but no, lets point a gun at the boyfriend and demand to know where the girlfriend is, when she is just in the bedroom asleep, simply stupid. The abductors dumb planning led to the replacement girlfriend getting killed, so they framed the boyfriend as a murderer instead of disposing of the body. And why are they switching out people anyway, would someone really pay for that, yeah, give me some other persons face and I'll take over their lives, not knowing any details of the relationship they'll be in. So you can't have two identical's occupying the same living area but the whole last part of the film had the main character conflicting with himself. And they let him smuggle a picture into his new life, but then put him in close proximity to his girlfriend so he can hook back up with her. At that point why didn't he tell her the whole plot and run to the police, see I didn't murder my girlfriend, shes right here. No, I need to have a final showdown with my identical and kill him. This movie made me angry and frustrated because it was so poorly written. I found the positive reviews of this movie laughable, are they paid plugs? I can usually make sense out of a movie when others don't and this one, it was just a bad script and the movie has plot holes that could sink the titanic.