zzalh NnjnjxjxjxjxjxjnxnxnxjsksmznxbjdksmnbzvxjsksmznxvjdksmznxhxksksmznxjdkBxjsksmbxidlanzhdosmzbx

jsmith-04451 Every now and then there is a sequel that is just miles ahead of it's predecessors. Rare I know but this is one of them. Vastly superior to the first two and I like all the Home Alone movies although #2 was mildly nauseating. I suspect the low ratings for this movie have more to do with familiarity with the original actors rather than whether or not it's a bad movie. Excellent story, excellent actors, well directed, and very funny. Thoroughly enjoyed it. "Over this Under, over". Ha ha cracks me up every time.

lorcan-61881 Home alone 3 is the third film to the home alone franchise with a new kid played by Alex D.Linz. The movie is about 4 criminals who lose a top secret computer chip hidden in a toy remote control car in a airport when the luggage is mixed up and it is taken home by a old lady who gives the toy to a young boy Alex who finds out he has chicken pox and takes a few days off school,the 4 criminals find the chip but first haft to go threw a bunch of booby traps set up by Alex who is sure to save the chip and put the criminals away. Home alone 3 I really thought would be bad but I was so happy with this improvement,the movie received mixed reviews,a lot liked it but a lot hated it. Macaulay Culkin I think was going to return but turned down the role,the movie features lovable Alex D.Linz who is very funny and a good actor who stars in Max Keebles big move which is a awesome film,the film is from the director of scooby doo the movie which I really liked. Home alone 3 once again is a brilliant installment to the home alone series and hopefully the next film will be as good..it won't.

powermandan Home Alone 3 caught a bad rap because it has not connection at all with the previous movies with Macaulay Culkin. This should not have been called Home Alone 3, but something else. I wouldn't go so far as to calling it the best in the series, but I do stand by this having the best storyline. The general premise about a little kid being home alone and creating booby-traps to catch the bad guys is the exact point of the first two, but it's what's beneath the surface that is the best. A group of bad guys steal an Air Force computer chip and must deliver it to a North Korean terrorist organization. They hide it in a remote control car where it is unintentionally picked up by a retired lady headed to suburban Chicago. Hr taking the bag was unrealistic; in an airport, who doesn't check to see if they have their own bag? Everybody knows some luggage look alike! She gives the car to her 8-year-old neighbour, Alex (Dinz) who just came down with the chicken pox. The thieves get the whereabouts of the neighbourhood, but break into each house hoping to find the car. Alex is home alone and sees the thieves through his telescope and calls the police. Everybody thinks he's crying wolf, but Alex is determined to catch the thieves once and for all. The thieves want to search in the daytime because they know everybody is either at school or working. What if there's people like Alex sick home from school? Or retirees? Then the place not believing Alex is also a bit unrealistic. He notices odd things happening in the neighbourhood ontop of intruders. The thieves are obviously experts, so wouldn't the cops work to plant hidden cameras or something like that? When it goes to classic Home Alone, the traps and slapstick comedy is just as great (sometimes greater) than the first two. Sure there's some unrealistic traps, but the first two had them also. Maybe it is just because I am a 90s kid, but I don't get why this is hated. Alex is just as good a Kevin, the thieves are cool, the story is better than the others. Home Alone 4 and 5 are the bad ones. I mean reeeeaaally bad.