Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

2011 "It all ends."
8.1| 2h10m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 15 July 2011 Released
Producted By: Warner Bros. Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: https://www.warnerbros.com/movies/harry-potter-and-deathly-hallows-part-2/
Synopsis

Harry, Ron and Hermione continue their quest to vanquish the evil Voldemort once and for all. Just as things begin to look hopeless for the young wizards, Harry discovers a trio of magical objects that endow him with powers to rival Voldemort's formidable skills.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Warner Bros. Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

TheBigSick Is this film good? Yes. Is this film that good? No. This is a film that was overrated by the audiences and the critics. The set pieces, visual effects, or plot are worse than those in Star Wars or The Lord of The Rings. Perhaps the film is just made for the fans, instead of the general audiences. The Harry Potter novel is brilliant, while the film is not.
Pjtaylor-96-138044 The conclusion to the series hits some of the strongest emotional beats, mainly due to our long-standing connection with the characters, and provides some grand visual treats in the form of extended magical battles. While 'Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 2 (2011)' may be the biggest in scale and it is entertaining, it does feel lacking in depth - since some things are left oddly unexplained - and instead comes across as an extended third act for its duration. It actually plays out like one long climax, with little of the build-up required to further invest the audience, but at least it's well paced and doesn't hang about. A strong note on which to end a phenomenal series. 8/10
hvkarateclub That would be the headline of the Daily Prophet the day after the battle. Absolutely nobody witnessed the fight. After so much was made in the other movies as to whether Harry really had seen and fought Voldemort how could they not have had the final battle witnessed by all the wizarding world. The greatest duel of all times and nobody was there to see it. Afterwards Harry walks into the school and everyone is like , hi harry , hey potter, ah by the way how'd it go out there. . It never ceases to amaze me, how a director , making millions of dollars, can make such a colossal blunder.
grantss The series ends, at last. Good riddance. (Until JK Rowling needs money, I guess).The first Harry Potter was interesting, and good fun. Much of this was due to the novelty of it all. The first Harry Potter introduced us to the characters and concepts of the series.The second used that template and provides another plot. The plot was fairly mundane and overwrought. At nearly three hours it was ridiculously long for a linear plot-driven kid's adventure story.This is all said, there was a momentum that kept it going. There were some new concepts and characters. All this was enough to make it marginally likable.By the third, however, it was a tired formula. From then on it was all about gouging more money from kids and nerds.Rating for this last one should be lower, but it gets a bonus point for finally ending this seemingly-never-ending, sequels-for-the-sake-of-more-money series.