hoytyhoyty Ignore the hate. People are just idiots and expect the wrong things.The low scores must have come from low brows all wanting massive FX budgets and big casts and big sets. This is a low budget story.HANGAR 10 is a 'found footage' movie, yet another one. But it doesn't suck for several reasons:The cast are good.The tension builds and builds.There are some jump scares and genuinely unsettling moments.The camera footage isn't just random "OOh! Something is happening so we must point out the ground!" rubbish. It actually manages to stay on-point.The later scenes get weirder and weirder.The ending is just explosive.Criticisms?* Some of the CG is a bit weak in the body of the film, but it gets better as the film goes, and the stuff at the climax is astounding.* The film goes a bit slow towards the end, and they start repeating themselves a bit, but it doesn't last long and suddenly the end-game story is upon you. It's not a boring film. Unless you are a moron with the attention span of a sparrow.Normally I'm not a huge fan of these films, but they've been creeping up and up on me as I find better and better ones. This is a good one.Haters gonna be morons, y'know? - -- ---

rich52 This movie makes the worst movie you have ever seen a potential Oscar nominee. Here is yet another installment of a complete movie done with hand-held video cameras. The characters of the girl and her friend with the video camera are alright, her boyfriend is a total jerk. Ninety percent of the movie is spent wandering through the woods and the ending is terrible. There is no real story-line, the dialogue is terrible, the acting is marginal (to the negative side), and it is boring. I will admit that the special effects in the last 5 minutes of the film are pretty good, but that is the only good thing to say about this abomination. If you enjoy wasting your time, this is the movie for you.

Adam Marks Hangar 10, the most poorly edited film I have seen in years. How the hell has this film been made and released. The cinematography is so bad as is the cheap sound design... cheap post production rubbish. As others have said on IMDb this is a terrible excuse of a film. Nothing feels or looks real even the acting. What an outrageous attempt into the sci-fi/horror world. This film is appalling in every way. No Horror, No thrills, Not scares = Pathetic.It's getting poor reviews all over the internet and I can see why. Never again will I watch, buy or even recommend such a poorly made film. IMDb should introduce minus Stars... this would get -9.

d b Honestly there really isn't much to say about this movie. I read other reviews which said it was slow, boring, and cliché, but as a big fan of alien movies I was hoping that despite being highly derivative it may hold some merit or entertainment value. Well I was wrong on both counts. Hangar 10 is indeed an incredibly boring, generic, and completely pointless addition to the found footage genre. The vast, vast majority of the movie is simply shots of 3 people walking through the forest filled with insignificant banter. I held out with the hope that SOMETHING of interest would happen, but ultimately gave up after an hour and fast forwarded the remainder of the movie. Things seem to pick up slightly towards the end, I mean they at least get out of the forest, but certainly nothing that comes close to justifying the large waste of time to get to that point. Hangar 10 is another victim of the sin committed by way too many found footage films (why these films do this is beyond me) where anytime something vaguely interesting starts to happen and the watcher expects the movie to pick up, the scene almost instantaneously (and jarringly with no transition whatsoever) ends and cuts to another bland scene of them standing around doing nothing while all the tension has dissipated. That's all I can really say about this one - there isn't enough content to analyze or bother bringing up. Extremely boring, pointless found footage movie that brings nothing new to the table. Avoid.