mike48128 For the best re-telling of the "Gulliver" classic, the 1996 live-action TV movie with Ted Danson, produced by Jim Henson, remains the best. This one is very cute but bears little resemblance to the classic version. Only two worlds are involved, The Lilliputians (who have electricity!) and an island of giants where Gulliver briefly becomes an unwilling doll house captive of a screaming, spoiled giant brat. The other worlds are not visited. Some mild similarities here and there to the classic. The "little people" have all but forgotten what started their war across the pond. Jack puts out a roaring fire by the only means possible-urination. (Yes, that's from the book!) Some other tasteless humor as well. It ends up being a parody of several things, including Times Square, "School of Rock" and "Iron Man". Where is this Magical Place? Why the Bermuda Triangle, of course. A bit cleaned-up on cable (which is good) with the usual 1/2 hour of commercials added. Clever use of the song "War, What is it good for?" Otherwise, a lot of fun but not meant to be taken seriously at all. Especially for Jack Black fans. Also, how did he ever get cell-service way out there?

Irishchatter Chris O'Dowd and Jason Segal had the worst English accents I've ever heard. You honestly don't have to be Irish or Amercian to get the English accent right like why did they have to make a balls of the casting?! Whoever had the idea of creating a remake of "Gullivers Travels", needed their heads checked! It was just ridiculous in casting them in the first place, they should've got better actors besides them. I like Chris O'Dowd and Jason Segal but at the same time, they weren't just suited for their roles! Emily Blunt's character sounded like such a whiny spoiled b**** that needed a reality check. Emily Blunt is a good actress but she just didn't suit the role well or did a good job. She would've been better off if she wasn't involved! Omg we go onto Jack Black, he was poor enough as Gulliver. The scene where he peed on the burning castle was the lazy way to get the movie entertaining. That was just wrong and weak.Everything involved in the movie was awful!

ApeLieUproar This film missed a good chance to tell Jonathan Swift's 18th century satire in a modern, humorous setting. With the comedic talen of Jack Black, it could have been interesting. Instead, it's reduced to standard Hollywood formula. But it doesn't even do it well. It's all paint-by-numbers, with all the actors palpably filling in the numbered areas. As another reviewer pointed out, Jack Black basically plays his School of Rock character. The other performances are uniformly wretched and even the effects aren't that great. But even if they were, the movie wouldn't be improved. Avoid.

p-stepien With a career at its disappointing pinnacle Lemuel Gulliver (Jack Black) delivers mail in a publishing house, whilst secretly, if pretty obviously, obsessing about travel editor Darcy Silverman (Amanda Peet). A nervous mix-up has Jack telling tall tales about his great adventures, thus unwittingly applying for a post as travel writer - and getting it by copy pasting a perfect article. His first employ has him chugging off to the Bermuda triangle in search of a sunny story, instead finding himself whisked away by a whirlwind straight into the kingdom of Liliput. There he finds himself trapped by General Edward (Chris O'Dowd). His only comrade fellow inmate Horatio (Jason Segel), chained due to his unwise endearments towards Princess Mary (Emily Blunt).Despite a somewhat promising cast, the intent to modernise the story has Gulliver's story transformed into a humourless self-parody with some crude or even mildly obscene jokes (surprising given its family friendly rating) forcibly making way for anything resembling narrative. The highlights of which is Black urinating on a fire or falling on his butt-cheeks with a Liliput inserting himself... you know where. As can be expected Jack Black (like him or forever leave him) returns to character as the endless man-child with some geeky back-story and limited wit. Therefore he seems entirely at home handing out some PG obscenity and molding remarks like 'Ship Happens'.The story itself has been trivialised to MTV style fanfare with none of the social commentary of Jonathan Swift (however outdated it may have seemed given its 1726 context), instead supplanted with two woozy love interests and a multitude of over-the-top jesters (also guised in the form of kings and generals). The overall story has whittled down to the bare minimum of Liliputs and conflicting kingdoms, but apart from the that the connection is non-existent. Despite some expensive looking special effects quality is a non-ingredient, instead reaching to gutter levels for humour and placing all the weight of carrying the movie on Black's antics. Given Segel, Blunt and co fail to turn up, instead handing out a bland exaggerated ensemble performance "Gulliver's Travels" is essentially a pretty cringing experience.