adonis98-743-186503 By day Gerri Dandridge is a sexy professor, but by night she transforms into a real-life vampire with an unquenchable thirst for human blood. So when a group of high school students travel abroad to study in Romania, they find themselves ensnared in Gerri's chilling web of lust and terror. Fright Night 2 makes Fright Night Part II from 1988 look like The Godfather compared to this. The acting was awful, the storyline was awful and pretty much the entire movie was forgettable, bland and just a waste of time and money. Just stick with the original and skip everything else that came after it. (0/10) (F)

jacobjohntaylor1 This is one scary movie AHHHHHHHHHHHH!. If does not scary you no movie will. Fright (1985) is better. Fright II (1988) is also better. Fright (2011) is also better. This not a sequel. It is a remake. Is a great movie. It has a great story line. It also has great acting. It also has great special effects. If it does not scary you no movie will. It is very scary. AHHHHHHHH! It is scarier then The Exorcist. That is not easy to do. It is a very scary movie. It is scarier then A Nightmare on elm street and that is not easy to do. It is scarier then Friday the 13th V a new beginning and that is not easy to do. It will scary you. It is a very scary movie. It will scary you.

elenaphysics First of all, I have to say that this movie has nothing to do with Fright Night. Nothing at all. I believe that the people who made this movie, just decided to name it Fright Night 2 in order to gain the audience of Fright Night. Fright night is like horror comedy. This one was action-horror movie. It is actually a very nice and decent vampire movie. They could have named it '' The dark countess'' or something similar. Because it is not a sequel or something. This is a real vampire movie. And very interesting one too. Much better than many other vampire movies. But the fact that they named it fright night 2 just to gain attention and audience for their movie, since it had nothing to do with fright night itself, this was the reason the audience did not enjoy it, neither they gave it a good rating. This movie is not excellent but it is nice. And some scenes are upsetting I would say. It is like a nice b horror movie. The cast was good, the acting was nice, the plot was nice, there was nothing I did not like

Destroyer Wod Honestly i clicked the spoiler box mostly because i am about to tell you that if you saw the original Fright Night, or even just the 2011 remake with Collin Farrel, well you saw this movie pretty much.First of all its not a bad movie. There some special effects that could use some work at times (while others are pretty good) but other than that, i would say mostly everything in this movie is very decent production wise for a low budget DTV. The problem is, its just another remake of Fright Night from 1985. Don't take the "2" in title in consideration, its not a sequel at all, not even to the remake.For example I spit on your grave 2 was pretty much a retelling of the remake, but it had different characters. Its one of those sequel that ditch the first movie characters and tell a very similar story as the first one but with slight difference. Fright Night 2 New Blood kinda do the same but use the same characters from the original and remake, only changing Jerry the male vampire for a "Gerri" female version. There is another slight change as now its not just a regular vampire but "Elisabeth Battory" herself. The problem is, this slight change does not affect much on how the movie flow. The same events as in the first movie appear almost in the same exact orders.So as i said above the production is good, and ultimately the movie is not bad to watch at all, its a decent time, but its like somebody saw both the original, its sequel and the remake, and decided to do some kind of mash up of the 3 with his own vision, yet trying to remain truthful to the original, maybe a bit too much actually considering it was already remade 2 years before being also very close to the original. Don't get me wrong, i like when a remake stay truthful to its original, but when a remake was done 2 years before also staying close to its original, i feel its just too soon. It was even for me watching it in 2017.But ultimately if you never saw any of the Fright Night movies, i would say this one is as valid as the other ones. I prefer the Farrel remake a bit more because i prefer the vampire neighbour set up rather than the exchange student one, and Peter Vincent was not only better portrayed but also more present in the movie.