TheLittleSongbird With such a gut-wrenching subject matter of the Khmer Rouge regime and the memoir being such an emotionally complex read and going full throttle with the horror, 'First They Killed My Father' intrigued from the get go. Also wanted to see how actress Angelina Jolie fared as director, another reason for seeing the film. Saw 'First They Killed My Father' on Neflix a while ago but, as one can tell, it took me a while to get round to reviewing it, due to music commitments, my "to watch and review" list getting longer constantly and also that it took a while to gather my thoughts on the film. Can see both sides of the argument of both like and dislike. 'First They Killed My Father' is a very admirable film with a lot of strengths and some very powerful moments, but the memoir and the actual events are much more harrowing.'First They Killed My Father' is an incredibly well made film with some truly beautiful images, evocative production design and atmospheric scenery. Jolie directs more than competently, the visual style is spot on and she does a great job ensuring that the perspective doesn't get too biased or one-sided, like when Loung sees good in the enemy in the scene with the captured soldier. Telling the story through the eyes of a child was a brave choice and makes for a persuasive argument, this way prejudice and politics don't muddle or overshadow the story and the potential trap of being too innocent is thankfully strayed away from.There are moments of great poignancy and power, not just the above scene but also the older sister's murder, the scolding and especially the walk through the blood-stained forest (the closest the film gets to capturing the full horror of what the regime was like). 'First They Killed My Father' is a thought-provoking film too and the message resonates and is still an important one. Loung is a person one identifies with and roots for every step of the way, and Sareum Srey Moch's extraordinary and very touching performance is an enormous part of why.On the other hand, while the restrained approach is laudable and somewhat appreciated rather than going the excessively graphic and potentially gratuitous route, 'First They Killed My Father' doesn't quite go full force dramatically and could have taken more risks. Not be as intrepid in showing the regime's full horrors, which were bloody so the graphic nature actually would have been a valid and necessary approach. Can understand what the film was trying to do, but some genuinely powerful. harrowing and poignant scenes (especially the empathising of the captured soldier, the death of the sister, the scolding and the blood-stained forest) are not quite enough in a film that tends to treat the subject in a way that's too careful, muted and tame. A tighter pace, less of the idyllic lingering shots and images (beautiful they are and some make an emotional impact, but not escaping the traps of self-indulgence, being distracting and not having much to them other than looking good) and more dialogue (which may have given the film more flow and cohesion) would have probably solved this.In conclusion, good admirable film but could have been more. 7/10 Bethany Cox

Geanina Cantero The cinematography is captivating, I am impressed with the quality of the film in general. I've read other users reviews about the apparent "lack" of dialog, but since it is told from a child's perspective. It sort of gives the sense of innocence and naivety of young Loung. My perspective is that it allows me to have my own thoughts about the events, what this story is telling me and it is making me feel. At the end I come to realize that this is not just a film, this were true events and the Cambodian people did actually go though that. They are brave and strong people. If it weren't for this film I would not know about this portion of Cambodia's history.I am not an expert, nor I am a critic. I am just one of the audience and this is my interpretation of the film.

Historicon First of all, let me start by saying 'First They Killed My Father' is not in my opinion as boring as some here have maintained, though this may be due to my long standing interest in the region and subject matter. Even so, the movie is unfortunately marred by factually incorrect anti- US propaganda via the disingenuous citation of the 'US bombing of Cambodia' as the cause of the communist Khmer Rouge ascendancy in Cambodia. I can only guess that foreign pre-sales or investment financing from Euro territories, where this film is likely to have a strong audience, essentially and implicitly 'required' an anti-US position in order to satisfy the mandate of the investors, state cultural bodies, and potential audiences.Film and media agencies in France, for instance, including Unifrance,  Film France, and others have been overtly aggressive over the past decade in re-parsing re-interpreting historical events in Indochina. especially with regard to the Vietnam/Cambodia situation subsequent to the French termination at Dien Bien Phu. Their goal appears to be to distance France from any significant culpability in the Indochinese disaster, extending from Vietnam through the Cambodian tragedy under Pol Pot, Increasingly common is the obligatory citation of the 'US bombing' (usually cited as a lump bogey-man term) as a primary cause of the rise of the Khmer Rouge. See, for instance, that same device being utilized at the introduction of the recent Cambodia-related documentary, 'Don't Think I've Forgotten: The Story of Cambodia's Lost Rock and Roll', and others.Though no fan of the massive and tragic US error in Vietnam, I'm aware of few if any serious Cambodia scholars today who would argue that the US air campaign in Cambodia gave rise to the Khmer Rouge regime as a primary cause, especially when compared to more significant factors such as the role of King Sihanouk in cultivating the KR as a fighting force. An even more obvious and traceable cause would be the first exposure of Solath Sar (Pol Pol, leader of the Khmer Rouge) to communism while studying at his Lycee in Paris in the late 40's and early 50's.Aside from this, it's not clear what component of the US/ARVN tactical and strategic and tactical air campaign Ms. Jolie and her French- Cambodian producer, Rithy Panh, are referring to when they cite the US air campaign in Cambodia in the 1970's.It is true that the brief and limited MENU bombings of NVA and Viet Cong border areas was not authorized by Congress, and were therefore illegal (As were the NVA and Viet Cong incursions into Cambodia). But the filmmakers seem to be conflating the MENU operation with non-secret tactical and strategic air strikes called in by Cambodian Armed Forces (FANK) spotters against the mixed KR / NVA combatant forces. Without intervention by air in many cases, Khmer Rouge and NVA main force units would otherwise have shredded the FANK Cambodian Republic armed forces opposing them. It was only the tactical use of B52s against KR and NVA forces which prevented the capture and fall of Phnom Penh as early as 1973, for instance. In other words, without intervention by the same US bombs cited as an accelerant to the KR regime, the Cambodian genocide would otherwise started an additional two years earlier.A more courageous, honest and authentic approach with 'First They Killed my Father' may well have been to undertake and share an objective examination of other greater causes at the time, most notably Cambodian King Sihanouk's role in encouraging the rise of the KR in order to regain his throne. Finally, the involvement of other relevant powers such as China and the Soviet Union in the Indochinese/Cambodian morass would also have been well worthy of discussion.Even more courageous approach would have been to allow the author of the original book, Ms. Ung, to direct the movie herself, which in turn would have validated the movie as a true local Cambodian effort. In any case, 'First They Killed my Father', so promising in its potential, compromises itself from the start and cannot thus be considered on the same rigorous level as 'The Killing Fields'

Ratanakvisay The film is honest to the audiences. Angelina has been putting herself inside the most complex political issue of a poor country which lead to kill 2 million people from 1975 to 1979.Follow a young girls who suffered, but survived from the regime. The capacity of empathy is the capacity to put the audience into the situation of the young girl and let them experience her doubt, her pain, her loneliness and her lost.