iceman88869 I really liked Feast 1 - Great cast, story and very well done. I found Feast II the other day and found it lacking, but still not bad. Feast III was just... Ridiculous. That is the only word to describe it. It's like the writer got high and blown out of his mind and started writing random trash. I could write a better story than what they came up with for the third one. It amazes me how these people get the money to make trash like this movie.I gave it a 2 only because it was good on continuing with people from the previous movies. That is the ONLY good thing about this movie.Maybe they should just start from scratch and reboot this like most everything else in Hollywood since Hollywood has run out of original ideas.

jlthornb51 The final entry in the Feast Trilogy is probably the finest of the three films and certainly the most satisfying in a cinematic sense. Director John Culager has produced an epic finish to his work and in the process made an outstanding stand alone motion picture as well. Here he has perfected his stylistic technique, influenced by the French New Wave Extremity Horror films. Sensitively observed and arrestingly impressionistic, the tension and suspense is at times overwhelming as Culager creates an sinister atmosphere of fear and dread. He certainly gets great work from his wonderful cast and Clu Culager, the director's iconic father, gives what's virtually the performance of a lifetime as the grizzled, heroic bartender. The closing scene will be talked about for many years as it's quite reminiscent of Reed's The Third Man and Antonioni's The Passenger. It is a brave artist indeed who allows the drama and suspense to build naturalistically with a static camera as an actor's expression alone tells us all the audience needs to know. Culager obviously trusts and respects both the script and his actors. Powerful, horrifying, and quite a deeply fascinating cinematic experience, especially for those familiar with French New Wave.

guinevere_tomas Let me start out by saying i am not a horror film fan. I've watched the classics but some how given up on a lot of modern day scary films,as they rely too little on plot and more on nudity,gore, violence and the latter. Now by saying that, I've watched all three Feast films. I was skeptical,as the reviews had me expecting very little from the films. Let me say,they're not as bad as people give them credit for. A lot of it is gross,and some of the situations are tacky,but i believe the creators of this film are giving the audience the intelligence to know that it's meant to be gross,tacky and out of good taste. With that being said, the movie was quite entertaining. I liked the new characters added to this one,as it follows directly after the second film.The movie's distasteful points I'm ashamed to admit i found a lot of humor in. I learned that comedy does not need to be intelligent or witty or even crafty to find it funny. If you're expecting Schindler's List or even The Ring, you're definitely not going to get it here. But if you're expecting entertainment packed in a horror-comedy film about disgusting monsters eating humans and killing everything in sight,you will not be too disappointed.Movies are supposed to entertain,and i think sometimes we get caught up in what's considered a "Good" movie, that we forget that if bad ones didn't exist,we would have little to distinguish the two.But overall,i'd give it a 7,i would've given it more had they given the new characters more screen time ;p

kosmasp I haven't read up on the making of, but this one feels like it was shot back-to-back with part 2. Actually it feels more like a successor (in tone and story-wise) to its predecessor than part 1 does with any of those two sequels. If you take into account that the first one was the best one, that isn't really a good thing though. But we have our written introductions back, which is a nice thing. Still worked best in the first Feast movie though.The subtitle of the movie is happy finish, but I kinda have a feeling they wanted to use "endings" instead of finish. I might be wrong, but that would have been more of a fit (especially thinking of "sloppy seconds" and its meaning). Some nice ideas and one theme towards the end, that reminded me of something out of a Monthy Python movie (and the Holy Grail that is). And because you can't satisfy everybody with an ending, we get the "wtf" treatment here. Same director as the other Feast movies