samcracc I have that movie and it is so funny. The first part in the movie is very funny. The Kool Aid guy is funny with Drew Barrymore, Cleveland Brown, and the Greased Up Deaf Guy. This movie is about a untold story of Stewie himself in the future where he sees Stewie as a grown up. So the Griffen's went to a pool. Peter Griffen knew that there was a new store in Quahog. So Peter Griffen thinks of a very good TV show with the channel 5 Action News station. His show will be (Do You Know What Grinds Your Gears). So then Tom Tucker got fired. Stewie stops drinking and then gets drunk. So then Brian takes Stewie to the Drunken Clam to get him more drunk. Just then the car was crashed into the Drunken Clam when they got drunk. So the Channel 5 News was on to tell the story what has happen. Then another show of What Really Grinds My Gears the last part and then gets fired then says F word and sensors it. This movie is funny you will like Peter Griffen's funny show even more.

D A I'm sure fans of the resurrected Fox television show Family Guy ate up this feature length installment with a fork and knife. The show's pop-culture referencing, off-kilter pace, and dark humor are there in spades, but that does not help shake the feeling this straight-to-DVD knockoff often feels like a cheap way of cashing in on the show's second wind with this slightly-more-unhinged format. While there are a handful of hilarious moments, the overall runtime does find the laugh factor becoming more spread out compared to a compressed 25 minute episode. There is a main focus on toddler-menace Stewie's questionable future, but that is told simply when sight gags and overdone flashbacks are exhausted. It certainly is not terrible, it just feels like more of a thank-you to fans then a bona-fide movie.

pauloone1989 I'm a HUGE Family Guy fan and I awaited the UK release of the movie with high anticipation. It should have been brilliant, but I'm afraid it wasn't.Through no fault of it's own (they had to try a movie, it was always going to be touch and go), I found it tedious after about half an hour. Family Guy is absolutely awesome, utter genius in fact when viewed in short bursts. As many people have already said, the dynamic works very well as thirty minute bites.That genius couldn't be transferred to feature length, and it failed miserably for me. I really was left gravely disappointed (I fear the same with The Simpsons movie).The story wilted and I found it hard to stay with, but the film is saved from the scrapheap, because of some cracking one liners. The only problem was, was that they should've been incorporated into the TV show.A shame.

coole_rellik I wouldn't call myself an avid viewer of Family Guy. In fact, I've only really watched one season (on DVD) and Stewie Griffin: the Untold Story. I laughed, I snored. About halfway into the movie, if even that, I dozed off. I literally went unconscious. My reasoning for this is that these kind of slapstick humor shows are intended to be viewed in made-for-television 20 minute segments, not a duration of an hour and a half. To endure the same "like this one time" jokes (cue reenactment of character's said past experience with humorous yet often dull comedic gesture) and perhaps pointless theme for an entirety of 90 minutes is a little much. I do very well believe that shortening the length of such a feature, being in the dumb but sometimes entertaining genre, would have caught my attention as the viewer. In my opinion, the makers of Family Guy would have been better off producing a compilation of episodes where Stewie's antics stole the spotlight.. but that's pretty much every episode, right?