MartinHafer Roberto Rossellini and Vittorio De Sica are two directors known for being the premier Neo-Realists. A Neo-Realistic film is one which is not filmed on sets but in the natural environment. And, the actors in the movie aren't professional actors. And, the stories are about ordinary folks. They were made this way simply because Italy was in ruins following WWII and this was the only way the COULD make pictures. While "Escape by Night" is by Rossellini and looks a lot like a Neo-Realist film, it isn't quite. It sure has the look and the story is about ordinary folk but the people in the movie, at least in starring roles, are real honest-to-goodness actors--mostly because by 1960 the Italian film industry was strong and growing. Had the film been made a decade or so earlier, it probably would have been an actual example of Neo-Realism. Now this does not mean the movie is bad in any way...it's not.This is the story of three soldiers who have escaped from a Fascist concentration camp, and American, an Englishman and a Russian. While this composition isn't realistic, it made for an interesting film. And, there were a lot of escaped Allied prisoners who were helped by ordinary Italians according to this film. The plot is VERY simple...the three men are shuttled from home to home to home until they could either make their escape or they would be liberated by the approaching troops.The acting and sets are all very realistic and the film is engaging. Perhaps it's not exactly fun or a must-see but it is well made.By the way, one of the more interesting cast members here is the Russian actor, Sergey Bondarchuk. While not a household name outside the old Soviet Union, this man was an incredibly brilliant director as well and helmed perhaps the most incredible Soviet movie ever made, "War and Peace". Depending on the edit, this sweeping sage is between 4 and 8 1/2 hours long! I'm crazy...I've seen it twice...the long version!

Movie Review SPOILER ALERT (Shortened Review: Nowhere near the drama I was expecting):I watched the 133 minute version on Netflix based on the positive reviews here. But after watching the film, and I don't care about the masterful, under-appreciated directing etc, I just want a good story and something to care about. It doesn't happen. The title led me to believe there was an escape from occupied Italy to somewhere in liberated Italy. This is World War 2 after all and the Germans had occupied Italy for some time after the Sicily invasion and the eventual Italian surrender to the Allies. Even the history is wrong. I don't believe the Germans held Soviet prisoners with the rest of the Allied POWs. Soviet POWs were used as slaves and worked to death. Almost none of the Soviet POWs returned alive after the war. But that is trivial to the plot of the movie. What is awkward is that none of the 3 former Allied POWs escapes - or at least the one who did escape just vanished and the audience is told he escaped. The POW escapees go out on some nights from their attic hide out and into the street on another occasion but that's it. Not really much of an escape for hardened veterans, and officers at that. There are a very few moments of drama when the film picks up. And miraculously, all the non-Italians learn fluent Italian by reading a book and hiding in a dreary attic of our beautiful Italian hero-ette. Even the Russian speaks decent Italian. I knew there was something hokey about the cast when the American POW kissed his Italian male acquaintance on the cheek. No American male would ever do that in an infinite number of centuries, let alone a soldier. The film just didn't flow enough for me and the story dragged with very few moments of drama. It's an above-average film but that's it.

parsifalssister Although it has its faults, as described in the review above, it is also a complex, intelligent document of the war. With Rome as a symbolic backdrop, three POWs arrive into the safe, but reluctant arms of a smuggler, and hide during an unspecified time just before the Allies reach the City.All of the characters speak in their own tongue, which is the complicated part, but it is not without its sense of authenticity in the circumstances. But even with these language and cultural barriers, the main characters create several dynamic exchanges.The pace is slow; the color bleak; the dialog often abbreviated; the relationships in doubt; yet, ultimately, we come to understand the forest of emotion we all experience during crisis, and war is among the most severe of crises.The Italian female lead is engaging and the British Major congenial. The Italians are splendid as both collaborator and rescuer. The Germans play a less significant role, but they remain the fodder for how choices are made of who will live or die, even as the war draws near to the end.The last 20 minutes are spellbinding as those choices are crystallized and strengthened by honesty, integrity and treachery.

simon-1303 I like a lot of Rossellini, but there is the odd clinker. Here's why:it's not sure if it's propaganda, documentary or drama, or all three ; it's set in a blackout, so it's more unrelieved grey than black and white; it's largely set in tenement garrets, though some odd scenes elsewhere; there are few attractive compositions, except repeated shots of the Rome skyline; it has national clichés instead of characters: impulsive American, reserved Brit, bad German, good German, bad fascist, emotional Italian etc. ; the characters enter and leave the film almost at random ; the dramatic scenes aren't, they stop and start abruptly and are poorly linked; plot developments seem to come out of nowhere; the interesting things often happen off screen; characters' behaviour is often reckless to the point of incredulity.Apparently rewritten, screenplayed, edited and scored on the hoof, with a great deal of family involvement,and I'm afraid it shows. sorry for being so negative.