G K Alex Jones is an agent of British intelligence whose mission is to create his own monopoly in the 9/11 truth movement and wreck it from the inside. He's discrediting calls for independence with his manipulations and obnoxious behavior. Sending in deceiving and ranting characters is one of the most common ploys by the British propaganda machine. He's misleading his listeners and filling their heads with deceptions and half-truths. He's leading them into the wilderness where they act like useless conspiracy theorists instead of doing anything against the British and the financiers. He's closely linked to the British and he surrounds himself with anti-American characters. He's opposing progress and anyone who stands up for the American state. He's fooling millions of people while the financiers and the City of London are wrecking the American economy and the American state. He's ranting against a "New World Order" while in practice fully supporting the plans of the London-based oligarchy. And he's a crook.Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy were killed by British special-forces. The CIA is a branch of British intelligence. Allen Dulles worked with the British for decades. After World War II the British captured key positions in the United States and launched an information war to continue dominating the world.

A.N. The problem with Alex Jones and other conspiracy theorists is their failure to account for multiple lines of causation and accidental trends based on human nature, which provide an Occam's Razor explanation that requires no conspiracies. Sure, there are some people plotting bad things behind the scenes, but they tend to be in scattered groups with limited power.But Jones sees conspiracies everywhere and forces disparate pieces of evidence to fit that assumption. He inserts just enough truth to hook gullible minds and fellow sufferers of the "Dunning-Kruger effect." It does take a certain cleverness to invent compelling twists and turns, but it's not wise cleverness. Jones seems to be a megalomaniac who wants people to think he's got the ultimate insight. Conspiracy theorists find rational explanations boring, so he'll always have an audience.The New World Order (a phrase taken out of context from old speeches) can be explained by trends in global commerce, encouraged by economic growthism that chases dwindling natural resources and finds "emerging markets" as existing ones play out. It may seem like they want to control people, but they mostly want to exploit physical matter around the globe. There is no need to layer mysteries on top of the natural human tendency toward gluttony and resource pillaging. Most of it is happening in plain sight.Regarding Jones' theories on population-control, it shouldn't take a vast NWO plot to notice that Man is overloading the Earth's carrying capacity and we need to lower birthrates to replacement levels ASAP. Nature will kill off (and already is killing off) millions of people via starvation long before the "elites" can poison the water.It's reckless to portray the serious need for growth cessation as an evil conspiracy. Smart people should downsize voluntarily, given so much evidence of resource depletion. Does Jones propose that we keep adding 80 million more people each year to this finite planet indefinitely, with so much existing overload? Historical genocides are often linked to population pressures in poor regions, even though they get passed off as "politics." Study root causes of the Rwanda massacre, for example.Jones also seems to be an evolution denier, and dismisses the science behind global warming in favor of conspiratorial plots. The notion that thousands of climate scientists have been colluding to raise taxes and control people is ludicrous (the CO2 warming effect was first noticed in the 1800s). AGW was all about physics until the lunatic Right grabbed the issue. Jones' interpretation of such things reveals his "scientific" thought process, which is anything but. He was at his best as an animated character in a Linklater film, and should have stuck with dark comedy.

Hal Guentert I am a fan of Alex Jones and his effort to inform the public and document the problems with our government on all levels. However, this documentary seems to lose some of the elements that gave the previous "Terrorstorm" documentary DVD much more impact.It is hard to put my finger on why "Endgame" lacks the same ability to capture attention while providing important information, but it was a little disappointing in that regard. Maybe it was the point that although things are bad in regard to the disconnect between the US Constitution, the Geneva Convention, common sense, and how government actually operates, there has been an underlying hopefulness that constitutional government and sanity could be restored. Maybe the implied message has changed with "Endgame", that we have reached a point of no return now having to go through a period of real depression and pain before things can start to improve.More and more patriots that I respect seem to have concluded that the American people are not going to be motivated to get the criminals out of government without a real slap in the face to wake them up from their delusions. People still accept the lies we are being presented as the "official" story, churches still support a corrupt government to keep their tax free income, politicians are still being bought, and tax dollars are still being used to fund special interests instead of the best interests of the people. There is no one able to overcome the mass media bias against anyone offering real solutions to ending the Establishment's grip on the levers sending us down a dangerous corrupt path.Now that bank "bail-outs" are used as excuses to rob Americans blind, and the two party system fails to provide solutions the end may be near, one way or another. Can these corrupt activities be reversed once the truth is finally confronted and the denial ends? It looks like one large bitter pill ahead.

luhlin This film is a great example of 'How NOT to produce a documentary'. Documentary films typically offer factual presentation of arguments, not blatant examples of innuendo building upon suspicion and leading to speculation. Specious arguments do not contribute to logical, reasoned and informed opinion. There may indeed, be good reason to suspect secret and/or restricted organizations, such as the Bilderberg Group, but presenting them by silly name-calling and strange assumptions proves little more than the name-caller is not very well informed.I also note the absence of 'Goofs' category on IMDb's movie info for Endgame and agree that it ought not to be included as the number of 'goofs' clearly outweigh the number of so-called 'facts' presented in this film.I would like to offer the producer/director a paraphrased quote from the late Carl Sagan - Belief, in the absence of compelling evidence is known as faith/truth; belief after the acquisition of evidence is known as knowledge. He may wish to gather a little more of the latter for his next endeavor.