Kev11sky This indie film is just plain fun. Sure, it's amateurish, but...It mentions some real ideas in physics (past and present) -- GUF theory; quantum theory; string theory; membranes; etc.It includes some actual history about Thomas Edison.It names some real physicists -- Einstein (obviously), Tesla, Bohr, etc. (check out the opening credits!)The props (early electronic devices) look authentic.One of the writers seems to have a medical background -- some nice details.Given the film's limited budget, the special effects are pretty good.The acting is good enough to carry the plot.I would compare this movie favorably to the first "Flatliners" film (I haven't seen the recent remake).Watch it and judge for yourself.

Ryan Einstein's God Model is an indie sci-fi film that proposes an answer to the age-old question: What happens to us after we die? Overall, the film is highly entertaining with a plot that incorporates many elements of a good story. The comic relief from the mostly serious situations the characters find themselves in is great. The acting overall is very good, with only a few scenes that contain some so-so performances. Despite being a low-budget film, it boasts some impressive special effects. The theoretical physics in the film is presented in a way that the audience can follow without any prior knowledge and without becoming "lost in the science." This is the type of film that will stick with you long after you watch it.

jlbco For SciFi fans, movies like this come along only once in a blue moon. An indie film done on a low budget, but offering high entertainment value coupled with good acting and terrific special effects. The storyline is something you can actually follow, and (unlike all of the commercial blockbusters) the film is not burdened with excessive violence, continuous shoot-em-up scenes, or improbable car (or space vehicle) chases. No monsters or demons, but definitely not a candidate for a "G" rating. Highly recommended.

Jeff Grey Very well done for the budget. PROs: Very original premise and sticks with you longer after the credits have rolled. Beautiful special effects - honestly much better than the rest of the production. CONS: Some clever humor, but also some very clunky science exposition. Cinematography wildily uneven - at times gorgeous and at times very amateur. Performances were pretty rough in spots. Better casting would have helped.All in all, this gets an A for effort and a B- for execution. If you like science, especially theoretical physics, you won't be disappointed! Also, LOVE the Chicago shots!