anthonyperez-05416 Disclosure came at just about the right time. Computers and the use of technology such as virtual reality was at its height in the early 90s, as were work place harassment and issues related to that. Certainly in Hollywood it seemed that is all they made and Michael Douglas seemed to have a propensity to choose such scripts where he is falsely accused and framed. Demi Moore is ravishing here and the pacing is really good. The setting used is good- scenic Pacific Northwest as opposed to Los Angeles and New York City. You should watch this film if you haven't already.

LeonLouisRicci Slick Movie with a Message, Albeit a Role Reversal. It is a Competently Made Story About Corporate Intrigue and Sexual Harassment. None of it is Surprising or Thrilling for that Matter. It is Sort of Hollywood Gloss Trying to be Relevant.It Might be Prescient in the "newly discovered" World of Workplace Power Plays Between the Sexes, but its Computerese and Techno-Babble Made Here to be Cutting Edge is Hopelessly Dated Out of the Box. That VR Thing went Absolutely Nowhere.Michael Douglas and Demi Moore are Perfectly Cast and Donald Sutherland is in His Slime Mode that He does So Well and the Supporting Cast is Fine, Except for Dennis Miller (more on that later). But the Movie is of Two Minds and Neither Comes Out Smelling Very Well. The Movie doesn't Stink but Considering the Talent Involved, Director Barry Levinson, the Cast and the Michael Crichton Source Material, it is Flat and Fatuous.Note...In this Movie Dennis Miller tries yet another career move, from Comedian to Actor to Sports Commentator to Radio Talk Show Host, and finally as a Flunky for Bill O' Reilly. The Man just won't give up even after one failure after another. He is an Embarrassment to every field where He shows up. Maybe He should try the pasture.

cronostitan By the specialist of the trendy thriller, this movie rather well pinned also speaks about the difficult square in the society that all those can occupy sometimes who do not enough sit - at least not endowed with varied and diverse protections. What it will be necessary to raise it is that Crichton dodges these long sequences of court with strong theatrical echo which we undergo very often among soaps in the TV (and also in John Grisham's books and in adventures of the TV show Ally Mc Beal), instead of it he joins in the life the office among this great number of "small" details that all those sometimes forget who do not work: another tour de force very rich in teaching...Because freedom is also a question of money although people are not globally more free than before in the old time, it is simply wrong!! Careful thus in "politically correct" falsified, in the traps, in the blackmail, in the propaganda, in the jealousy...

Mr-Fusion Everybody's out to get Michael Douglas.Marketed as a controversial examination of a man's charge of sexual harassment against a female co-worker, "Disclosure" is really about paranoia. The reverse discrimination angle is a (albeit large) plot point, but it isn't the crux of the movie. Which is where the movie takes a sharp turn off a cliff.Douglas is a software engineer for a large corporation, and he's been turned down for the big promotion - in favor of a man-eating former lover (Demi Moore). Moore, the new V.P. invites Douglas to her office for a catch-up session, and things get downright steamy. But Douglas is a family man, and he walks away from an enraged (rebuffed) Moore. The next day, Douglas walks into the office to the accusation that he was the one doing the harassing. A very large chunk of the movie is devoted to the harassment charge, with Douglas calling in the help of a media-hungry lawyer (Roma Maffia) to help him with his case. Sordid details emerge, cracks appear in the Douglas household, and and it's not a pretty skirmish. But Moore is just a cog in a larger scheme to eventually make Douglas look incompetent and throw him out on the street. That's what this movie is really about: Douglas is worried about his job. It's all a very conspiratorial and manipulative oppression of the poor white family man, complete with hushed voices in the office. Throw in some deliciously early '90s CGI and a ridiculously lame virtual reality subplot, and you've got the market fresh makings of an overly- long film that never rises above goofy.3/10; a real chore