malcolmgsw This film was distributed by Associated British Paths who were on their last legs as is evidenced by this abysmal film.This is the company that made many fine films in the fifties including The Dam Busters and Ice Cold In Alex.Now they were reduced to making films like this.It is a very pale imitation of the James Bond films.Notwithstanding the fact that there is some location filming on Malta it would seem that every expense was spared.The film is poorly written acted and directed.It is quite difficult to believe just how badly Patsy Anne Noble tries to act.It shows how desperate the producers must have been.It is also difficult to understand why the film was given an X certificate.Presumably the brief nudity qualified it.However this would have reduced its potential audience.Mind you that must have been small enough to begin with.

loza-1 A lot of money must have been spent on this film, which was filmed on location in Malta in full glorious colour. The result, however, is an utter disaster. For a start, one wonders why the film makers hired Anita Harris to sing the film's one song, when they had an excellent girl singer playing the villain.The acting is not good. Only one character, who plays a drifter, stands out. The rest of the cast are not good actors, and they struggle with an unexciting script. Some of the underwater scenes look good, and are probably the best parts of the film. Patsy Ann (Trisha) Noble, who comes from Australia, looks as though she swam her underwater scenes herself, and did not use a double. Great frogwoman she may be; as a singer she is flawless, (whether she sings in English or in French) and has perfect vocal technique. But I don't think she is a good actress at all, and I am surprised that her acting career lasted so long - and in America, too. The only significant features of her character, Francesca, is that she is a dead shot with an harpoon gun, and that she sleeps in a bed with black bedsheets. The plot is forgettable. So, if you have something better to do, you would be better doing that instead.

gridoon2018 So what do you expect from a movie with a title like this? A deadly femme fatale who kills repeatedly and without remorse? You'll get that....but only twice, at the start and at the end of the film. Patsy Ann Noble is perfectly cast, and she is equaled, if not surpassed, in the hotness department by the two other female cast members, Wanda Ventham as the good girl and Caron Gardner as a ditzy conquest for the bad guy; this film comes from the era where the thick, strong, curvy, healthy look was the "in" look for women. But the story, after setting up an intriguing locked-room mystery, meanders, the underwater scenes are - as usual - boring, and there is FAR too much screen time given to an old drunk character, who turns out to be of no consequence to boot - was this actor a friend of the producers or something? This film would have been better without him. ** out of 4.

vinnienh This movie has got it all: stunning photography, excellent (character) actors, bikinis, superb underwater-scenes......and: a great musical score! Although the story could have been more exciting this off-beat pearl of 60s UK-crime is definitely worth an 8 out of 10.