Days of Darkness

2007
Days of Darkness
6.8| 1h44m| en| More Info
Released: 26 September 2007 Released
Producted By: Cinémaginaire
Country: France
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Jean-Marc is a man without qualities living in times that are out of joint. His wife and children ignore him; he's a mid-level government functionary in Montreal doing his job without care. He has an active imagination of sexual conquest, but his only real feelings come when he visits his aged mother, whose health is failing. When his wife leaves abruptly to work in Toronto, Jean-Marc sets out to reorder things with his daughters, his social life, and at work. In a world that at best is a farce, does he stand a chance?

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Cinémaginaire

Trailers & Images

Reviews

hemril I saw the comments saying that this movie is a copy of American Beauty or the Private Life of Walter Mitty. Even if I can see where it is possible to see similarities, I insist this is a whole new movie all together. Many elements are quite original, even though the intention of the movie is to show us how we can see life pass us by and not even be aware that there is something wrong. The movie very clearly asks if a life in a suburb, with commuting to a meaningless job and a life partner who is completely absorb by their work is worth living. To me, this movie goes further than AB or WM because it demonstrate how depressing our world can be. I watched it 6 or 7 times and I still discover hidden messages in some of the images. Denys Arcand is a great director and he has contributed in an important way to helping put Québec cinema on the map. To me, this is an 8.5 so I will give it a 9 on the voting window.
chupito-1 Of course, if you are a person who believes our modern society is the culmination of human evolution and you are comfortable with the western way of life, you might not like this movie so much (referring to the review posted by someone from Chicoutimi). Otherwise, it has to be one of the most brilliant criticisms about the North-American way of life. Another reviewer compared it to Brazil from Gilliam, and there surely are some similarities, though Arcand does not go as far into surrealism. The cast is wonderful. All in all it is a great satire that makes you reflect on many aspects of life in our time. It is funny, but really dark at the same time. I liked it even better the second time I watched it. It just lacks a little something - maybe a stronger climax - to be a masterpiece.
kluseba This movie is well described with one word: "depression". The whole atmosphere of the film is just depressive, melancholic, sadistic, boring and senseless. Everything is grey, everyone is unhappy, everything is going wrong. Concerning the atmosphere, the director and main actor did a great job, without any doubt, but who wants to see a movie that shows just a negative sense of the life and a pseudo-critical family or society portrait? You have not any fun by watching this movie, but if you want to feel down and depressive, go for it, but watch it alone, because it could destroy the atmosphere of a movie night with some friends.
Harry T. Yung Watched in the Toronto International Film FestivalNot having seen "The decline of the American empire" and deeply touched by "The barbarian invasions", I find "Days of darkness" (the finale of this "social comments" trilogy) interestingly different but not quite as superb as "The barbarian invasions". Not that this matters but a repeat of an Oscar for best foreign language film is unlikely.The issues tackled in "The barbarian invasions" are prolific (the French Canadian perspective, the Canadian medical system, differences in perspective across the border, friendship, social and 'moral' values, drug addiction, the financial world of today, and more). While there is an appealing sense of humour throughout that movie, it is ultimately heartrending. "Day of darkness", on the other hand, is a biting satire. There are claims that the movie transforms magically, towards the end, into a work of poignant emotion. While not entirely groundless, this is nevertheless an overstatement. The gloomy undercurrent is there right from the beginning, despite some of the hilarious touches. On the other hand, although the end is somberly pensive overall, it is not entirely devoid of the sparks of wicked satire we have witnessed throughout the movie. The story we see is markedly universal, despite being set in a slightly exotic (to the average global audience) stage of Quebec. The time frame could be futuristic but not so much that you would really notice. The protagonist you know only too well, a typical civil servant (this one a "complaint hearer") in a typical modern day environ – bureaucratic government office, lifeless colleagues, aggressive-career-woman real estate agent wife, teenage daughters "who wouldn't even notice it if he drops dead", frustrating routines of daily commuting, and so on. It is almost unnecessary to say what a rich, happy hunting ground a satirist will find here. Things at which this movie pokes fun could be a mile long. These jabs range from brilliant to mediocre. And as mentioned, while you are laughing, you heart sometimes sinks.But that is only half of the movie. The other half is the protagonist's fantasies, which serve as a safety valve to keep him from going insane or maybe even becoming a psychopath (he did talk seriously about want to kill his wife at the end). The cinematic qualities of these fantasies are again uneven so that the movie sometimes drags. But the chief object of his fantasies is a muse-like figure played by beautiful Diane Kruger ("Troy", "Merry Christmas", "National Treasure"), a definite attraction of the movie. Towards the end, not even these fantasies can keep him from reaching his breaking point, when he says to hell with it all, packs a little back and goes off to a somewhat isolated, modest cottage left by his father. That is where we get the poignancy. The end however is not entirely tragic. While the object of his fantasy finally deserts him, his estranged wife and rebellious daughter drive by and drop off some of his old clothes and books, leaving a tiny ray of hope for some sort of reconciliation. But the final tragedy, not so much explicitly shown as left for the audience to reflect on, is the realization that even if he goes back to a "normal" life, nothing is really going to change. The days are indeed dark.One interesting concluding observation I would like to make, as I just watched "The Savages" the day before watching this, is that in both, a large part of the pathos comes from the helplessness and agony in watching aging parents slowly withering away in their sad remaining days. From a macro, non-personal angle, this is something inevitable for the majority of the baby boom population. Each individual case, however, hurts in its own different way as shown in these two films.