bijeshgupta Just kill Zoe and the movie will be better. Waste of time & money.

tichy_cnp So at this point we should assume any movie trying to capitalize on the night of the living dead franchise is cancer. This movie was painfully dull. Romero couldn't have saved it, not that he would. I fast forwarded through the last 30 minutes.

gigazabal The first few minutes are okay. Maincharacter introduced, a little backroundinformation about said character, Typical Zombie Outbreak, okay for me.And then... A landslide of a movie. The characters are stupid and there is no evolution. I mean.. they are stucked in this apocalypse for years and still have no no chance to fight these zombies? What the heck did they do the whole time? And this asshat of a major (or captain or whatever, I stopped paying attention)... He remains an ass till his end.I don't mind the bloodeffects. Over the top, yes, but I know worse.The zombies: Rotters? Really? the first one, the big bald, is great. This stalker zombie... Okay. It ist sonething new. But why is there only one? They try to explain it, but the whole story is more than stupid. Two stars for trying something new with the Stalker Zombie, and if they did not called it DAY OF THE DEAD it could have been a good movie with really bad acting...

hellionfilmsuk Romero's Day Of The Dead is arguably the best of his original trilogy. They tried to remake this masterpiece with the help of Mena Suvari, Ving Rhames and co, and it worked out terribly. You'd think another attempt would draw on the failures of that turkey. But Bloodline manages to enhance the failings even further to produce this absolute dud of a movie. The acting is incredibly wooden, and that's usually something I can get past but if it weren't for utterly poor story. I'd watch it if you are a pure zombie genre fan and need to tick it off your list but I'd sooner rewatch Miss Suvari shooting at zombies that can walk on ceilings!!