evening1
There is a whole genre of films about accomplished men who know diddly-squat about women, and this is one of them. If not for the acting chops of Spencer Tracy, it wouldn't be worth viewing. Tracy plays the oddly named Cass Timberlane, a judge who is a well-respected member of the upper crust of his small community. One day a minor witness in his court catches his eye, and it's the beginning of an unlikely May-December romance with Virginia (Lana Turner), a too-perky-to-be-believed blonde from the wrong side of the tracks. We're supposed to believe that there is chemistry between "Tim," played by a 47-year-old Tracy, and "Ginny," while Ms. Turner was 26 when she played the role. Yeah, his judgeship has a sumptuous home, complete with perfectly well-mannered maid, as well as a beautifully decorated country lodge, but money has nothing to do with this match. Then we have the character of Brad (Zachary Taylor), supposedly the boyhood friend to Tim. This slick and smarmy lawyer never makes any secret of having the hots for Ginny and he almost succeeds in seducing her. Ms. Turner's performance is consistently annoying. I hated her demure, overly polite presentation and didn't find it believable, given her roots. According to the script, Ginny learns some harsh lessons along the way and eventually finds her way back to the affections of her principled older spouse. "You're the only consistent thing in this whole cockeyed world," she tells Tim. Tracy does of a good job of portraying a man who stands for something and learns from his experiences along the way. When he got angry, however, I was reminded of his portrayal of Jekyll/Hyde only a few years earlier and that was unsettling. (I even thought it might have been Ms. Turner who played his victim in that film, but that had been Ingrid Bergman.) This film is long and boring at times but is probably worth the effort, again, for Tracy's admirable example.
jhkp
It's been many years since I read the Sinclair Lewis novel. I could be wrong, but I seem to remember some interesting observations about a middle-aged, upper-middle class man, confronting a woman of a younger generation and a different social and economic class, in the 1940's.In that rapidly changing world, she's more liberated, more independent than the girls he grew up with. There's a generation gap between men of Cass's era and young women like Jinny, in the postwar world. It's a reflection of the way the country had changed, over the course of a few decades.Obviously, if they had gotten any of this into the film, it would have been far more interesting than the soap opera that emerged. Jinny just seems to be bored and restless because she's immature and shallow, and Cass just seems to lack understanding of her predicament because he's older and set in his ways. Still, Cass Timberlane, as one of MGM's superior factory products, can almost be enjoyed for the production values alone: gorgeous black and white cinematography, stunning women's costumes, detailed sets, nice use of locations, expert use of rear projection (lush, atmospheric shots of Scott and Turner on a NYC penthouse terrace), etc. As good a film as money can buy. And as good a cast.Was Lana Turner a good actress? I don't know - but I like watching her. Not just because she's pretty (and here, she's very pretty) - she's also extremely charming - especially in the early scenes - and there really is a good deal of chemistry between her and Spencer Tracy. (Jennifer Jones, first choice for the part, turned it down). Tracy is of course, excellent. And immensely likable. The romance between them is always believable, because he is such a charismatic, charming, somewhat devilish, interesting, intelligent, and apparently loving person, how could she not love him? And she is so beautiful, delightful, and seemingly sensible, how could he not fall head over heels for her? Both seem like down-to-earth people, so it's not hard to understand how they relate to one another. And also why they clash.George Sidney - who usually directed fluff like "Holiday In Mexico", and "Anchors Aweigh", tries his hand at something serious, here, and while I don't know why he got this big project that probably should have gone to Clarence Brown, or Cukor, he does a pretty good job. Just scratches the dramatic surface, though, unfortunately. He does better in the first hour, which, as usual, is the lighter half.Later on, it just reads like magazine fiction.
FilmOtaku
"Cass Timberlane" is a film about unexpected love and the choices you have to make when you're in love. Directed by George Sidney and starring Spencer Tracy as Cass, a judge in small-town Minnesota who is part of the middle-aged country club set. He's generally living a comfortable and content existence when he meets Virginia (Lana Turner), a woman who is at first a witness for a small claims case and later runs into. They strike up a friendship and then a romance, culminating in their marriage. When their child dies while being born, Virginia finds herself more and more restless and spending more time with Cass' best friend, the younger and handsome attorney Bradd (Zachary Scott). The country club set sees them getting closer, and collectively send Bradd to New York under the guise that he is being transferred for his job, just as Cass is starting to wonder if something is up between Bradd and Virginia. Virginia convinces him that there is nothing going on, and eventually Cass offers to move them to New York so she isn't so bored. Cass is then forced to choose between the love he has for his town and his job, and his love for his wife and her needs.Spencer Tracy is excellent in this film, as he is in all of his films, and Lana Turner is also quite good. The scenes between she and Zachary Scott have enough heat in them to make us wonder if they are guilty of adultery as well. The story is a pretty straightforward drama, nothing special, but it is a good script and offers up enough conflict to satisfy without resorting to overload and ridiculous emotion. This is an average film that was well worth looking up. 6/10 --Shelly
k_jasmine_99
As much as I love Spencer Tracy, there wasn't much he could do with this boring, predictable, overly preachy script. Not to mention how ironic it is to hear him expound the virtues of fidelity when he had numerous affairs, the most famous being Katharine Hepburn, while still married.Lana Turner is lovely, but I just couldn't get into the story line. I think it started out as a good idea: Cass Timberlane (Tracy) marries a younger woman (Turner) from the supposed "wrong side of the tracks", much to the chagrin of his snobby friends. Can they make the relationship work or not? If they would have developed the story more, and preached less, I think it may have worked. Instead it is just a two-hour sermon, more or less.Well, at least there is a cute kitty included in the picture.