Boo

2005 "You don't have a ghost of a chance."
Boo
4.1| 1h34m| R| en| More Info
Released: 13 May 2005 Released
Producted By: Graveyard Filmworks
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

The friends Emmett, Freddy, Marie, Kevin and his reluctant girlfriend Jessie decide to spend the Halloween night in an abandoned hospital. Meanwhile, the younger Allan meets the old friend of his father Arlo Ray Baines and asks him to help to find his vanished sister Meg in the same spot. The two groups meet each other in the mental institution section on the haunted third floor.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Graveyard Filmworks

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Leofwine_draca BOO is your typical indie horror flick set in an abandoned hospital. A bunch of unlikeable characters decide to visit and find out the place is haunted by sinister spirits from the past. Now, this is still a very bad film, completely clichéd throughout and lacking in interest, but it's better than a lot of indies I've watched recently. There's a cameo from Dee Wallace as a nurse, the film's quite well shot, and the script's a little perkier than normal.
Spikeopath Bunch of pretty teens convene at an old abandoned mental hospital for Halloween. Things go awry.Written and directed by Anthony C. Ferrante, Boo is either a loving homage to all things involving "haunted house" cinema? Or one of the laziest horror movies made in 2005?Everything but the kitchen sink is thrown at the audience for this one, with the sound mix turned up to the max for, erm, max impact. The fear of this, the fear of that, what's real? What's not? And let there be blood! There will be blood!Acting is ordinary, as is the writing, but scene setting and location filming is not half bad. In a nutshell, it's a horror film that you show to your pre-teen family members to prep them for far better horror pleasures in their up coming adult life. 4/10
fire-58 This is a bad movie. I even have a appreciation for low budget movies i really do, i have seen a whole bunch.The speed of this movie is very very slow in the start. Then just lags on and on.The funny thing about this movie is the quality of the film as in "filming process" in not bad at all. This movie looks like a real movie. That is why im so surprised that the story and the actors we not better.I have never gave a movie a 1 on here before. But i had to on this movie because there are a million reasons why this movie could have been better but it was not due to things that were very fixable. Don't even bother.
aesgaard41 These days I can't watch a ghost movie without picking it apart for how paranormally accurate it is. This movie starts out almost believable, but then it ends up as sort of a rehash of "Night of the Demons" with ingredients of "The Evil Dead" and "House on Haunted Hill." The story is about a haunted location used as the site of a Halloween get-together; it's supposed to be haunted and when it turns out its true, a plot device is contrived to keep them inside. That is where the whole plot becomes unbelievable. It has an uneven plot, dragging down for scenes of character exposition. One girl's psychic visions of the hospital's past also breaks up the more linear flow of the movie which does have several legitimate scares, and moments that only happen in bad horror movies. The most interesting character is the cop, a former actor from the Seventies, but the location too, an actual haunted location, provides a lot of presence. It alone could have carried the movie, but the main ghost, wasted in a lot of body-jumping nonsense, isn't that menacing. There's a lot of needless gore and some shaky foreboding, but it also seems to be its own sequel: one of the characters going in does so looking for his sister who vanished within. Overall, it's a good movie, but not a great one. A lot of creative energy went into this movie, but it's constructed in such a way that makes it hard to follow.