Edu D. Conto In category: 6 stars. The script you know of the other reviews. The film looks like a teen comedy, but actually is a nymphsploitation. Attention to the month of birth of the top 5 actresses and the month of release of the film. We have then: Fabiana Udenio 13 years old, Marion Kracht 15 y.o., Carolin Ohrner 16 yo, Nastassja Kinski 17yo and 18yo Véronique Delbourg. There are brief scenes showing breasts of them, except of Fabiana. There are also many scenes with undergarments, very sexy. As has been said, the film has a soft photography and reminds David Hamilton movies. It's an adaptation of the novel The Passion Flower Hotel, written by a British novelist Roger Longrigg under the pseudonym Rosalind Erskine. Moreover, the film is tasteful and well watchable, without falling into coarseness.

mattymatt4ever I would say I wasted my money purchasing this movie, but it was only $2.88. You get what you pay for. That's no lie. Of course, they place Natassja Kinski on the cover to lure you into checking it out. Well, she's the star and she is beautiful as always. But that's not saying anything at all. This is a low, low- (almost no-) budget comedy that will knock you out better than the best anasthetia money can buy. Even the nudity can't save it. The film even starts with a shot of a topless female. Besides, there isn't THAT much nudity (it nowhere near reaches the lengths of softcore porn) and it's SOOOOOO boring that nothing--and I mean NOTHING--can possibly save it. I would write a couple of paragraphs about how much I hate this movie, but I don't like to pick on extremely low-grade movies that are pretty much...supposed to be bad. This is hardly a movie; it's just a collection of poorly photographed images. Film should've been re-titled BORED-ING SCHOOL.My score: 2 (out of 10)

rlcsljo This film was apparently made the same year as "Debbie Does Dallas" with highly similar plot lines. School girls form a "company" offering sexual services. Only in this film the girls charge money, not because they need it, but they believe that they should be compensated for their "sacrifice", even though they were the ones itching to lose their virginity. They offer their "services" to the boys school across the bridge, who promptly form a "company" of clients. Through a series of mishaps, no one seems to get laid.This film starts off rather promisingly with the camera focused on a pair of breasts on par with Shannon Elizabeths (not quite though, these girls were real teenagers and plastic surgery was less common then). The girls appear in various states of undress and do a shower scene together. But since apparently they were under age (Fabiana Udenio was fourteen, Natassia Kinski seventeen). There clothes stay on during the sexual encounters.I must admit that this film grows on you with repeated viewings and with time--I dont think this film could be made today with the strict child pornography laws in the U.S.If you want to see some gorgeous girls in their flowering womanhood, this one is one of the tops--despite a weak plot.

William Only reason why this film got released by Atlantic pictures in 1982 is because young Kinski was in the film. Other than that, this film would've been lost in the drive-in market (I think it played in 1977 as PRETTY SCHOOL GIRLS in some US market in the 70's). Little laugh and bad dubbing, but it's good to see a early performance from two beautiful actresses Kinski and Udenio (who is in many U.S. films).