Horst in Translation ([email protected]) "Betty Boop's Hallowe'en Party" is one of the shorter Betty Boop cartoons at 6.5 minutes. It is from the year 1933 and of course it is another Fleischer Studios production. Betty likes to party and has invited all her friends over for Halloween. The first half of the film is basically the preparation, then the party begins and finally a villain shows up to destroy the fun, but Betty scares him away. Nothing scary about this little movie though despite the time of the year that offers some scares occasionally. The title is a bit of a lie as there is probably only a minute actually dealing with the party itself and this minutes is not really funny or entertaining. Same can be said about everything before and afterward. This was not a good Betty Boop cartoon. It had so many characters, but they did so little with them. Not recommended.

MartinHafer When I downloaded this film for free from archive.org, it indicated this was a so-called 'banned cartoon'. Well, I really cannot see why this would be the case. I know that the Pre-Code version of Betty Boop (before mid-1934) was sexier than the later one---though so many Boop cartoons feature this sexier cartoon and weren't listed as banned on the site. Or, perhaps there was something objectionable and that portion was excised. All I know is that I noticed nothing objectionable in this cute cartoon.The cartoon, not surprisingly, is about Betty Boop having a Halloween party. It goes from her and some friends preparing, the party itself and a nasty gorilla* crashing the party and terrorizing everyone. Fortunately, like all Boop cartoons, it ends on a positive note.All in all, this is a fun cartoon. A bit dated perhaps but still fun. Like all these cartoons, the animation quality is terrific and there is a wacky sense of humor that was pure 1930s fun. If you do see the cartoon, you might notice an NRA symbol at the beginning—this was to indicate the film was in compliance with the National Recovery Act—a piece of legislation that was ruled unconstitutional and so was only BRIEFLY seen tacked on to the beginning of some films in 1933.*This is the same gorilla that was the villain in "The Herring Murder Case" which debuted two years earlier.

theowinthrop This has it's moments as an early Pre-code Betty Boop. On Halloween a scarecrow finds a printed invitation to Betty's house for a party. He shows up, and after warming himself he assists her in setting up her home. Like most of the plots of Fleischer's cartoons, the initial structure is jettisoned for new incidents and characters to take over. The last we see of the Scarecrow is his putting up wall pictures of witches and black cats from special paint cans labeled "witch paint" and "cat paint". He flicks these on the walls, and the witches appear on brooms while the cats appear with their backs humped up. Betty is shown coring pumpkins (actually a cat descends with a device to do the coring, but Betty acts tired after each one is cored).Soon the guests arrive, and we see them bobbing for apples - one gets knocked out by an apple he is supposed to catch with his teeth. Then, about two thirds of the way through the cartoon, we see a gorilla arrive. YOU TUBE suggests that this particular cartoon was taken off the television shows of the 1950s and 1960s because it is a racial stereotype (presumably for African - Americans), but it does need stretching to see that. The idea of a gorilla as a symbol for a Black male is an old one, but this gorilla has nothing suggestive of what racial stereotyping would suggest. It just is a bullying gorilla, who first hits a tree (hurting a behind that suddenly appears), and blackening the eyes of a inoffensive owl. He then sees the party, and appropriates all the apples in a bobbing for apples. But soon he is being pursued by goblins and witches, apparently directed at him by a mysterious big cat. He is eventually chased out of the party, to the happiness of the other guests. But was that supposed to suggest the stereotypical superstition associated with male African-Americans too? I still find it quite a stretch.It is not a bad cartoon, but not one of the best efforts by Fleischer's studio.

tedg I really like some of these Betty Boop cartoons. Many of the early ones deal with the overlap of evil, sex and hallucinogens, often mixed with jazz and Black men. This is one of the tamer ones in terms of the evil tone: she's in control where often she isn't.But it is worth seeing quite apart from that because it is pre-code Betty. The animator had a real sense of sexual movement, and in spite of her dog's face this is one enticing body. When she calls the demon-bears to her party, she does so by bending over and wiggling her panty- covered butt at us three times. That wouldn't happen in a couple years.Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.