SimonJack The opening script for "Berlin Express" gives one an idea of what to expect in this movie. "Actual scenes in Frankfurt and Berlin were photographed by authorization of The United States Army of Occupation, The British Army of Occupation, The Soviet Army of Occupation." The film is based on a story by Curt Siodmak, a German writer, director and producer. He fled Germany after Hitler came to power. and wound up in Hollywood in 1937. Most of the action takes place aboard the The Main Seiner, an American Army express train that ran from Paris to Berlin, with a stop at Frankfurt. The film narrator says that the Berlin Express "is a sort of traveling Grand Hotel for soldiers on leave and on orders, for War Department clerks and wartime wives, displaced persons, diplomats." Other people also seem to be able to travel on the express, judging by those in this film.Otto Franzen (Paul Lukas) was a German industrialist, now a dealer in scrap metal. Henri Perrot (Charles Korvin) had been a member of the French underground and is now in commerce. James Sterling (Robert Coote) is a British war veteran and Allied teacher for re-education in German schools. Lt. Maxim Koroshilov (Roman Toporow) is a Russian soldier on orders. Lucienne Mierbeau (Merle Oberon) is a multi- linguist and secretary. Hans Schmidt (Peter von Zerneck) is a German civilian who speaks English and whose occupation is drowned out by the train whistle. Robert Lindley (Robert Ryan) is an American agriculturalist working to rebuild Germany's food and nutrition programs. A mystery traveler is soon understood to be Heinrich Bernhardt (Fritz Kortner), but we know he is a decoy. He was Otto Franzen and Paul Lukas was the real Bernhardt.These are the people who make up the main cast of the film. Others take part later in Berlin. All of the cast are superb. The cinematography is outstanding. The technical work and production qualities are excellent.This is the first Hollywood movie made in war-torn Germany after the May 1945 end of World War II in Europe. It shows the almost total destruction of the cities of Frankfurt and Berlin. So, this film has considerable historical value. As bleak and terrible as the destruction appears – three years after the war, the film doesn't show the human toll. One can get a sense of it from the stark landscapes and scenes devoid of all but a few people. Then, the contrast with the scene of the busy open-air market amidst the rubble. That's a place, the narrator says, where one can sell and buy anything "from diapers to diamonds.""Berlin Express" was made as a mystery-thriller, but there's a great deal more to it than that. It is foremost a bleak picture of the widespread destruction of Germany. People of the 21st century may view this as a horror of war, and rightfully so. Those who watched the film when it came out would have been more aware of the insanity of it. Not because of any hateful or spiteful vengeance on the part of the Allies for needless bombing. But, because of the refusal of Germany to surrender with a lunatic at its helm. So, this film stands not just as an example of the horrors of war, but of the insanity of the war perpetrator who then refuses to surrender in the face of defeat and instead invites his own destruction. This film also has a clear propaganda theme. It's hope is that the Allies will be able to work together and help eventually to rebuild the devastated Germany. It does this with some light humor and jousting between the men on the train from different countries. And, the film touches one more topic – post-war Nazism. It has an existing Nazi underground that reminds viewers that Nazism itself is not dead. Indeed, the neo-Nazi beast was to rear its head soon in countries around the globe. Three things about the film are puzzling. The first is the shooting of a pigeon in the opening scene. Who would be shooting pigeons with so many people around the Eiffel Tower? And why didn't the shooter pick up the pigeon? I'll give a pass to the pigeon having the message for the suspense, but it wasn't necessary to the plot. The second strange thing was on the train. One of the men who escorts the decoy Dr. Bernhardt asks Schmidt for a light as he leaves the train. He passes a message to him. It's the same message found on the pigeon: 21:45, D, 9850, Sulzbach. Schmidt was the undercover bodyguard for Dr. Bernhardt, as we learn later. Was that just an Allied relay to him about the message? The only way it makes sense is that Schmidt then got the American military guys to switch the decoy's compartment. Then, the only person who would know where to kill Dr. Bernhardt (the fake one), would be someone on the train who saw the changes. We all find out later who that was.The third strange thing seems to be a hole in the plot. After the train stops at Sulzbach, Lindley and others find that some compartments have been changed. His first compartment, A, is now occupied by Lucienne who had been in B. Lindley doubles up with Perrot in E. They find D unoccupied – where the decoy Bernhardt had been, and the Army captain said it was to stay that way. So, Bernhardt must now be in B. But as the train resumes travel and the decoy Bernhardt comes down the corridor, he enters the now vacated compartment D and closes the door. The explosion goes off and kills him. Why didn't he go into his new compartment B? It seems like a plot hole and scripting or directing error.

JurorNumberThirteen A very average film noir only made interesting as a piece of social history in its location filming around Berlin and Frankfurt. The documentary style voice over used a lot at the beginning of the filim I found irritating and the script and Miss Oberon's performance were poor. The rest of the leading players are average apart from the ever reliable Robert Coote playing his English toff. The images filmed in Germany were sobering to say the least. The portrayal of the distrust in Germans in 1948 and the scale of devastation of Berlin and Frankfurt compared to now was very quite shocking. My father was in Germany just after the war and was guarded when talking about his time there but was visibly upset when he talked about how tough it was just to exist in Germany at that time.

seymourblack-1 This spy thriller which is set in the period just after the end of World War 11, depicts in documentary-style, the level of devastation, turmoil and political intrigue that was prevalent in Germany at that time. An assassination, a kidnapping and the presence of a group of Nazi activists illustrate the type of dangers that had to be overcome in order to achieve a more peaceful future for the country and an atmosphere of mistrust and suspicion amongst the Allies did nothing to make this aspiration any easier.Shortly after a military train travelling from Paris to Berlin makes an unscheduled stop because of an obstruction on the line, an explosion in one of the compartments kills a passenger who the other travellers believe is Dr Heinrich Bernhardt. Dr Bernhardt, the German head of a fact-finding commission, had formulated a plan to unify his country and was on his way to an important conference in Berlin.When the train reaches Frankfurt, the passengers who were travelling in the same car as Bernhardt are taken in for questioning by a U.S. Army Colonel and it becomes apparent that the man who'd been killed was a decoy and that the passenger who'd called himself Otto Franzen was actually the real Bernhardt (Paul Lukas). A mysterious French lady called Lucienne Mirabeau (Merle Oberon) is also revealed to be Bernhardt's secretary.At Frankfurt station, before he's able to continue his journey, Dr Bernhardt is kidnapped and a desperate Lucienne pleads with some of the other passengers to help in the search for the missing diplomat. An American agricultural expert, Robert Lindley (Robert Ryan), English schoolteacher James Sterling (Robert Coote), French businessman Henri Perrot (Charles Korvin) and a Soviet Army Officer, Lt. Maxim Kiroshilov (Roman Toporow) are eventually persuaded to help.Lindley and Lucienne's search leads them to a bombed out brewery where Bernhardt is being held by a group of Nazis and they get involved in a shootout before being able to escape and continue their journey. Unfortunately for Bernhardt, yet another attempt is made on his life before the train finally reaches its destination.In typical docu-noir style, a voice-over is used to provide some exposition and also information about various important landmarks etc. The whole movie has a realistic feel and Lucien Ballard's location footage of the heavily bombed cities of Frankfurt and Berlin is extremely impressive and also very affecting.The rather strained atmosphere which existed amongst the passengers of different nationalities at the beginning of the journey is later replaced by a spirit of cooperation when individuals from the four allied countries symbolically work together to search for Bernhardt. This suggests a feeling of optimism for the future which is in line with the idealistic views of Dr Bernhardt. A more noirish aspect of the plot, however, is the misleading identities and motivations of the characters, especially early on in the action.Director Jacques Tourneur's work is exemplary throughout but an interesting technique that he uses at various junctures is to utilise windows to frame some important shots. Examples of this are the sequence during which the various train passengers are introduced, the footage which shows a number of the ruined buildings and also a scene during which Dr Bernhardt is attacked on the train."Berlin Express" is an interesting movie with a talented cast whose performances contribute strongly to the way in which the mood of a particular point in time is captured so convincingly.

dbdumonteil The last lines of the movie leave a bitter taste in the mouth and the pacifist's dream has not yet come true."Berlin express" is a travel trough a wasted land ;the thriller side (whodunit:and there are clues to find the killer) takes a beck seat to the depiction of the ruins the madness of a FÜhrer has left behind .Attention to detail is remarkable:the cigarette falling on the ground in the station,for instance.And Tourneur is part of the directors who can make the best of a banal place :a nightclub ,a clown and a false medium can be as disturbing as a train belting along in the night (see the moor in " circle of danger" , the children's party in "curse of the Demon ",the pool in "cat people" ).