Graham Harvey I have been involved in climate change education & action for many years. I found this film lacking in direction. As a narrative, it seemed to lack direction of defining the problems and solutions in a hard hitting way. There was too much talking with experts including politicians. What I believe was needed in terms of giving the strength to the call to action was more visuals of current & possible disasters of the future. There was a strong sense of despondency that Leonardo seemed to have. This would have fitted in ok as the challenges present & future were shown. But the film needed to show more options for resolution & a sense of the wonderful in terms of what some nations are doing while balancing it out with the peril of inaction. I felt like Leonardo had given up hope, so why bother making the film. He needed to demonstrate more sense of danger danger danger... unless unless unless. These challenges should have one sitting up & paying attention but I felt like I was reclining as a somewhat miserable & pessimistic person told his story of the last 15 years. This was not meant to be a film about Leonardo & his associates. It was supposed to be a film of the people. I did not get a sense of that. Even the section filmed in India did not get amongst the local population. Instead we are listening to a well meaning but middle class Indian politician do a diatribe about US consumption. That point had some validity but again the solutions were not being effectively presented.

xdmoritz The film discusses the urgency to take action against climate change because the effects of it will be devastating. Every person is responsible for their carbon footprint and can reduce it for example by eating less beef. I liked the documentation because it opened my eyes and taught me about climate change. However, I would have liked for DiCaprio to discuss the aspect of nuclear power.

jesses-66466 This kind of documentary can empower people because knowledge is the beginning of change and many big and enriching moments.Sunita Narain was featured in the movie and made a big impression because she showed the huge gap of mentality between developed countries and the developing ones. This Indian woman shows us the injustice and put in the foreground the environmental issues of USA.She explains that every developed country talks about the use of renewable energy but most of them don't put their ideas into action. In particular the case of the USA who doesn't take any measure in the environmental innovation. She also talks about the two big visions and goals of developed and developing countries, for one side this aim is to make people aware about environmental issues but without showing the example but how can we talk about environmental issues when the priority to developing countries is to give at everyone the accessibility at a source of energy ? This movie shows the impacts of human activity with the use of fossil fuel, deforestation, which put endangers the planet, the animals, the vegetation and of course humanity. Different visions and points of view from the world but a same morality ... It's time to change !

kanebarner The movie shows us the consequences of the global warming, and what we are going to do to solve this problem.I think Sunita Narain made an impression on me when she said: "I'm sorry to say this, and I know you're American, so please don't take this the wrong way, but your consumption is really going to put a hole in the planet." She has very clear ideas about what we need, for example when she said what 1 American consumes at home is equivalent to 61 citizens of Nigeria, she knows about what we need and what we must to do to solve this problem. Also she wants to inform us about what is happening in the world.I liked it, because for me it is important to be informed about what is going on in the world and now I know what I can do to make the world better. I also learned important things, like there is no support from the Unites States government against global warming and that the islands could disappear as a product of the increase in water levels. My rating is 8/10.