douglas lally Chaz Bono, formerly Chastity, is the sole child of 70's TV stars Sonny and Cher. In 1995 she publicly announced she was gay after having been outed in the tabloids, and I don't think anyone was surprised by this news. This film, produced by Chaz Bono himself and financed by Oprah Winfrey and other entertainment power brokers, documents her physical and psychological transformation from female to male, culminating in gender reassignment surgery in 2010. The production value is quite good, the subject not so much, which I will get back to. Gender transition is arguably a topic most people know little to nothing about. The steps one must take to invert his or her gender, legally, financially, socially, and psychologically, speak to the need for this transition, not the want. The film does a good job to inform the viewer that yes there are those of us who never fit into the gender in which they were born and that this phenomena is quite real. Chaz was one of the lucky few to have the means and support by which to surgically alter herself into a man, at least as close to a man as current medical techniques can confer. We are given intimate insight into how this transition, from hormone therapy to scalpel, impacts relationships for better or worse. Chaz's mother, Cher, lends the lone dissenting voice to her daughter's decision to switch. I was actually surprised to see her agree to be interviewed in this film and her narrative was unmistakably vague and evasive. Otherwise the film is crafted to showcase Chaz as both a heroic and tragic figure, even something as a victim of cultural indifference to her struggle for acceptance both socially and personally. But I just wasn't buying it. Chaz ostensibly made this film to lend a voice to the LGBT community as well as PSA for transgender equality. I suppose his celebrity status was supposed to propel that message. Yet I found him boring, uninteresting, untalented, and something of an attention vampire. I really struggled to like Chaz. What I felt was here is this person, with this problem, and without the last name would be a forgettable nobody, who creates a film for himself and demands we celebrate him. While I do not dismiss the struggle in the abstract, the film did not compel my sympathy for a privileged "famous for nothing" person suffering from internal identity issues. The world has real problems and Chaz Bono does not deserve 90 self- congratulatory minutes of veneration.

martinelanthier I must say this right away: boy was I glad that this documentary was NOT about Cher or Chaz's Relationship with his mother. I believe the point was to inform the audience about trans-gender issues. The only necessary mother-daughter aspect that was important for the audience was the process of accepting the modification in her daughter's gender. Therefore, the director has succeeded in making this a very good documentary.The focus of this documentary is to make us aware that being a trans-gender is not a disease or an illness, and that it is more common than we may think. It can also definitely be used to raise people's awareness, but also to show trans-gender children and teenagers (and even adults) that there is hope and that concrete means can be undertaken to modify their gender.Two thumbs up! 8 very shiny stars out of 10!

runamokprods Interesting documentary about Chastity Bono's sex change to become Chaz Bono. It deals well with the complexities of life for both the trans-gendered, and for the children of very famous people. Quite touching and informative, it makes the still uneasy and confusing (for many) subject of sex re-assignment far more human, and understandable on both a technical (how does it work?) and - more important – emotional level. It also doesn't shy away from the hard parts (e.g. the difficult personality changes brought on in Chaz by his intense hormone therapy). Chaz is allowed to look self-centered, and even like a jerk at times, without it impeding on our sympathy or identification. He's just a person, like all of us, which is the whole point. While the film-making itself can be uneven, this is the kind of film that helps people open their hearts and minds to those who seem 'different'. And that is always a worthwhile thing.

szulc-adam Becoming Chaz is a perfect example of how a film festival's high reputation can over-hype rather mediocre filmmaking and even less impressive story telling. The premise of the film is quite obvious to whomever knows anything about Cher and her daughter Chastity who few months ago began her testosterone therapy in order to change sex. The film was very warmly welcomed at Sundance; the LGBT issues are always given a special spot in the festival line up and attract hordes of people who see these films as the main pillar of independent filmmaking. Oprah Winfrey helped to produce the film and Rosie O'Donnell came down to Sundance to make a brief introduction. But it was the one person that was absent at the premiere who was the real talk of the after movie discussions - Cher. The directors try to present a reliable and heart warming image of Chaz Bono, but very soon after the movie starts we realise that it is Chaz who really conducts the story development and the way his persona is portrayed on the screen. He selects the aspects of his life to which he allows the audience to enter. It seems that the directors who don't want to appear ungrateful to Chaz for letting them to be involved in the documentary don't exhibit any desire to seek the truth beyond the surface of Chaz's life. Chaz's relationship with his mother is the most interesting part of the film and unfortunately the most unsatisfactory. Cher's resentment to her daughter changing sex is unresolved and the only hint of what is going on between her and Chaz is presented after the credits end. Cher briefly meets Chaz after the premiere of her latest film Burlesque and tries to avoid the uncomfortable confrontation. But then, the film is not supposed to be about Chaz and Cher, it is meant to tell the story of Chastity becoming Chaz. However, as Chaz is left in charge of his own portrait he is unable to assess his doings in an investigatory fashion and so the final product ends up being superficial and disappointing.