quincytheodore Never mind that the premise of a building defending itself is both corny and cliché, this particular movie manages to wreck any kind of semblance to decent film-making. It defies all logic in such terrible way that it's not even funny laughing at it. Practically every overused gimmicks in horror is rehearsed and in so much worse way than even the most mediocre films.This is definitely the lamest case of recorded breaking and entering. The cast is large, yet none of them is actually likable. Everyone seems very obnoxious, even the characters meant to be sympathetic. The entirety of the movie is basically one stupid patrol of this supposed grim building, filmed by the familiar shaky cam and needless found footage antic. Its structure is so flawed audience can shuffle the scenes and it would barely matter since there's little continuity.Worse yet, it tends to be comedic much more than it is terrifying, which for a horror is has none. The victims die in such agonizingly silly ways, and coupled with extremely bad acting, it's the shallowest attempt at horror in probably this decade. People would cross their eyes as though they are in pro wrestling, make stupid faces and roll around like they are impaired by epilepsy as substitute for fright.It'd be funny to see these people die like in bad high school drama, but it only ends up being pitiful.

Flow Overused! Cheap! Classic horror moves! No surprises!It sure was a bad building, in a bad story, provided by a bad script, directed bad and acted the same. Some actors did better than others, probably those who believed they will make it big eventually and this is their rock bottom start. The extremely small budget made a huge impact sadly, I've seen better camera work and CGI in the 80s movies, the dialogue was as cheesy as possible and the ending surely did not help.It was just another horror for me, nothing more. I love this genre, I watch underground such productions in order to put a honest, of course, personal review on IMDb and help out, either warn about the movie, or recommend it. This one is definitely a pass!Bad Building trapped inside a bad movie. So don't make a bad night out of it!Cheers!

atinder I liked the plot of the movie , its not found footage movie, which I thought it was going to be.I liked the back story of the building, the intro took about a about five mins , which felt long, As the movie is only 75 mi long.The movie starts, with the boss was giving group of thr TV show one last chance.So they go to haunted building, that messing around with them and killing them of one by one. There were one or two things, I liked about this movie but those are over shadowed by the bad stuff I like the really bad acting from most of group, mainly the main lead role, he was the worst actor of the bunch And the cgi effects in this movie, were the worst I have ever seen, it was bad, it looked like a really bad cartoon.I did like the deaths scenes in this, some were a tad gory It far from being one of being one ot worst movie, I have seen but it's had its moments here and there 4 out of 10

Bloodmarsh Krackoon So, there's been a nice little trend going on in the horror genre the last few years - and by 'nice,' I mean crap. The trend: a group of ghost hunter's enter (insert building of your choice here) to increase their ratings and save their TV show.Not only do we have to watch really bad reality TV, but now we have to watch really bad horror movies about really bad reality TV. I mean, what genius thought of this one? 'Bad Building' has it all - bad acting, bad lighting, bad audio, bad special effects, just all around bad. Random Ramblings of a Madman: 'Bad Building' is one of those horror films so bad, that it doesn't even qualify for 'worst movie I've ever seen,' because it can't even pull off the humor necessary for such an awesome accomplishment.