jelewat1 The ending of this movie did surprise me. The same ending was used long ago in another made for television movie - Special Bulletin. I think this was Marina Sirtis best performance though I did noticed sometimes her character had a (US) southern accent and sometimes there was no accent. The two hot looking lab assistants were just in the movie for show and since everyone on Earth is incinerated in the movie anyways it doesn't really matter. Good for a SYFY movie.

david-haigh "...I don't know!"This simple exchange from the film sums up this appalling film. Appalling. There are no redeeming features. Well, one of the women is quite hot (Nya). Everyones' accents are all over the place. Acting is very basic (apart from a black guy). The plot doesn't make sense. The science doesn't make any sense whatsoever. The special effects don't make sense. Nothing makes sense. Oh, France gets destroyed and there's this hot girl. That's it in terms of the good stuff. Very slow/special needs people might find it entertaining for a few minutes max but someone should make sure they know how to change the channel/hit the stop button.

anortham17 Truly, truly awful . . .I am a TNG fan, so watched when I noticed Marina Sirtis name. But that accent . . . bad, bad, bad . . .The plot should have allowed a reasonable film - scientists creation threatens extinction of the planet. Spoiler: It blows up. They do keep telling you that, so its not much of a spoiler. But there - I've saved you 90 minutes of your life you will never get back . . .Other posters who try and say there is some good acting or other features are wrong.There isn't. Wearing a Bruce Willis radiation suit painted black apparently makes you pant when standing still, or trying to hobble (badly) across flat ground. Poor collagen lipped silicon breasted science assistants are probably really nice people, but weren't required here - they added nothing to script or story line. Make up on survivors in disaster scenes came out out of my three year olds paint set. Applied by a three year old. Raging fires in desolated city scenes came out of a 1990 video game - its so long since I've played it I cant remember what its called any more. And I don't think the console even works - just like this movie.Other posters have given some of the plot holes big enough to drive Jupiter through.For plot holes and bad acting, pick a scene, any scene, and I'll provide the list.Some movies are so bad they are good.This one isn't. Its just bad . . .

tender_vittle I don't know why i didn't turn this awful movie off. It was like watching a shriner car wreck, i just couldn't look away but I got a good laugh at least.The acting was forced and very poor. Marina Sirtis used to be a half way decent actress but that hokey fake accent and halting... way... of...saying.... terrorist every three seconds was irritating. Not to mention the fact that one second she has a down south drawl, then a Texas drawl, then a Kansas farm girl thing.My 5 year old writes better stories with crayons, ie: the two lab assistant porn stars "oh my god he's been like shot, oh no, now i've been totally like shot too, i don't feel well" Another person said the girl that played nya was like the UK Meghan fox, well the original was annoying enough and we don't want her, now we get stuck with a British version that sucks worse... KEEP HER, and if you ever see this movie for sale, buy it and use it for skeet shooting to save some other poor sap from wasting two hours of they're life to.