Ethan Walter
One of those movies that's so bad it's absolutely hilarious. I don't understand all these negative reviews. Take things for what they're worth and you'll enjoy this a lot more. Fantastic movie that i've watched multiple times. I mean midget vampires? Was anyone really expecting a high budget thriller? For what it was intended, it produced.
ross_johnson
i have no idea how this film ; 1. got made 2. got put on a distribution system 3. got upgraded from VHS to DVD. 4. did not cause another holocaust.i would love to see the production file on this film. it looks similar to something a 13 year old boy might make with his mates after seeing the movie Blade for the first time. the editing is awful, the camera shots are awful, the acting..................but if you are like me and a sucker for those awful films then watch it. if only to appreciate that there are films out there that are worse than Uwe Boll's 'House Of The Dead'you can also use it as a huge morale boost knowing that whatever films you may churn out through your life, there is a 99.99% chance it will be better than this pile of tripe. Absolutely phenomenal.
Lance C. Hough (SongMan336)
Ankle Biters is quite possibly one of the worst movies ever made. Period. The story and plot are practically nonexistent. The acting (if you want to call it that) is atrocious. The camera work is boring and careless. I am a frequent renter of the lesser known horror flicks, always trying to find a diamond in the rough. This one is as rough as they come. And believe me, there is no diamond to be found. I have NEVER started a movie that I didn't finish. I will always watch them through from beginning to end. Ankle Biters is the one exception. After roughly 70 minutes, the stop button was pressed. And that's saying something. I mean, I sat through Terror Toons . . . TWICE! Case and point: Ankles Biters bites . . . HARD!
diaclonex
I unfortuntely made the mistake of not renting this first and went ahead an bought it. Wow, was I sorry. This movie had potential. Key word: "Had". The problems? Lets start with number one. That of course is the filming. This had the unmistakable look of a 1990 camcorder look. The kind that stopped being produced in 1992. Number two. Does anyone that had a hand in making this movie know the concept of AUDIO COMPRESSION?!?!?! The audio levels were haphazardly mixed together. And no doubt, all dialogue was recorded with the mic that was on the camcorder. Terrible. Number three? Number four? Number five? I won't even bother. As this movie started, my friends and I knew it would be bad. But at least I was hoping for at least 'some' entertainment. Not even the distraction of alcohol could help. I am sorry that I own this. Anyone want to buy my copy ?
