jacobjohntaylor1 This is not has scary as the original Anaconda. Anacondas is also scarier. Anaconda III is also scarier. But still this a very scary movie. It has a great story line. It also has great acting. It also has great special effects. If this movie does not scary you then no movie will. This movie is very intense. Mad scientist free a giant Anacondas .Some people are trying to kill the giant snakes. Very scary. Crystal Allen is a great actress. Linden A.s.h.b.y is a great actor. Danny Midwinter is a great actor. C.a.l.i.n S.t.a.n.c.i.u is great actor. Ana U.l.a.r.u is a great actress. C.l.a.u.d.i.u B.l.e..o.n.t is a great actor. This movie is very intense. Warning do not watch this movie alone.

jlthornb51 Donald E. FauntLeRoy (David Wolper's North and South, Book IV) directs with his acclaimed stellar style and delivers a fine entry in the Anaconda saga. Acting as cinematographer as well, he creates a environment of overwhelming dread and stark raving fear as he uses Romanian locations to stunning effect. Working from a script that is both intelligent and exciting, FauntLeRoy coaxes superb performances from a renown cast of actors, some of whom are returning after their respective triumphs in the previous Anaconda film. With an inspiring score by Peter Meisner, pulse pounding and atmospheric, this is an incredibly intense motion picture experience. Not for the faint of heart, the thrills never let-up and some of the set piece sequences will likely sear fantastic imagery into collective psyche of any audience. Probably the best sequel to the original Anaconda, the film is certainly superior to most sequels and offers a cautionary environmental message that gives it a bit more gravitas. There are indeed rampaging anacondas featured but Anacoda: Trail of Blood rises above the average horror film with production values seldom seen in movies of this type. The special effects are breathtaking at times and the shocks are unrelentingly intense. Simply one of the best horror films produced in 2009.

Julian Zhang The movie is derived from the ending of anaconda 3 (no spoilers) with the anaconda being evolved again and is loose in the woods killing people again, and the survivors must work together to defeat the snake, again. The movie has things in it that are good and bad.The good: the movie has a much more understandable plot than the third movie. The movie's acting is a little bit better than the third movie. The character development is good, but some of the characters have unknown histories. The movie has good action and violence that fits very well with what the plot is.The bad: the movie again has weak computer CGI because of a low-budget. The movie has some weak effects. The acting in some scenes is weak and very poor.Overall: the movie is better than the third movie, but has some weak elements to it that are either different or the same as the third movie.Score: 5/10

BewaretheBlade I saw this on Sci-Fi Channel on it's first air date, and I must say it certainly exceeded my expectations after seeing it's predecessor. The acting in this movie is actually pretty well done; something I was not expecting. Gore is also 20 times better, way better than 3's ketchup packet squeeze effect. But, as always giant snake movies have their cons. Don't expect anything special in the graphics department- the snake in the first Anaconda was even better than the one in this movie. The story is also exceedingly unbelievable, and at some points just plain dumb; the snake regenerates it's head after it gets popped...The conclusion? This installment in the series is pretty much on par with the first one. It has plenty of action, and for once not every supporting character dies (cliche repeated in every Sci-Fi movie). Only watch this only if you have an open mind or if you are in the mood for some good cheesy fun.6/10