wizbang68 The 3rd installment of the divergent series is all about the end of the prior film. Is there anyone outside the wall? Should we go and who decides? If there are those outside the wall that are still alive what do they want from us? Is it a good thing? Are those outside lying? This movie does a lot to make you consider in terms of your world is based on your environment. If you don't look outside your normal day to day life you will have a very narrow view of the world you live in. People who seem to be honest and have your best interests at heart are just trying to get something from you or further there own ambitions of power. No, the movie is very left untied at the end it was as if the production company had their sights on making Allegiant a 2 film ending. Unfortunately, the film didn't get great reviews which caused the next film to be cut. Funny, but now was the time to watch the film because the storyline is more about how your point of view is shaped based on your environment. So many of us don't look outside of our News Media that we watch normally and the writers that we read to consider the world may be much different that we may think. It's very warped from reality.... but your reality is your reality.... but isn't it better to see the world as it is?

scottnamo None of the films held up to the books, however, Allegiant was flat out terrible. Even if you didn't read the book, this was a poor film with no connected story.

averyfralish-01308 SPOILER ALERT I loved the story to this movie but none of it was the same as this movie. I loved reading this series and getting captured by the story, but I was majorly disappointed in this movie. I mean, was Tris's death not important enough to put in the movie? I expected much more.

Bendystraw Cumberbund It was a decent movie, but my colleagues and I did manage to find some problems. Firstly, we were unclear on how the regular, non- genetically modified people were able to dispatch the corrupted, genetically modified security guards in hand to hand combat with relative ease. It seems if humanity had developed advanced genomic modification technology, employing security guards who cannot be manhandled by Theo James would be a fairly simple task. Unrelated, it seems like Miles Teller's character, Peter, turns evil in like every movie. His character's lack of meaningful development really is a downer for all the pretentious kiss-ups who watch these movies, who may be led led to believe that they can never change. Also, why do the main characters keep letting him make decisions? It doesn't really make sense. Finally, the film revolves around the so-called "Chicago Experiment," which, if I may be candid, seems like one of the most egregious examples of researchers ignoring the scientific method and all control standards put in place by the organizations that govern international science. I don't understand why a study of that global significance would be organized in a non double-blind procedure without multiple control groups and extensive peer review. In the movie, however, there doesn't even appear to be an independent variable. Also, the entire approval process is four people talking to two other people, one of which is literally the result of said experiment. It just seems like they're asking for bureaucratic overreach. Anyways, we've already sent our concerns to Lionsgate, and we assume they are working tirelessly to fix these problems.