A Walk Among the Tombstones

2014 "Some people are afraid of all the wrong things"
6.5| 1h54m| R| en| More Info
Released: 19 September 2014 Released
Producted By: Double Feature Films
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Private investigator Matthew Scudder is hired by a drug kingpin to find out who kidnapped and murdered his wife.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Double Feature Films

Trailers & Images

Reviews

venumstrike How many more of these is L.N. going to make. Boring acting, no heart in it at all. Going through the motions to get a paycheck. Stupid ending, not realistic in anyway. Weak action scenes, no suspense. What tombstones are they walking through. One scene in a graveyard, even if it's used metaphorically. Very much of a waste of time. The premise is absolutely ridiculous so far fetched it's like we have no minds. Thanks but no thanks. Please Liam no more, just put some effort into a real movie that forces you to actually act.
tiailds A movie that attempts to hearken back to an older era of crime drama. It does a good job of doing so, though the repeated mentions of y2k were unnecessary."Was it interesting?" It had unique characters, though some interactions were slightly weird. It's not groundbreaking, but the story was pretty original.2.5 out of 3."Was it memorable?" The cinematography portrayed the city well with abandoned areas, back alleys, rainy and cloudy days. The problem with that is overall I remember it as being mostly gray.2 out of 3."Was it entertaining?" The flashback action scene was real good. The fights later on in the film were not as much, but still rather realistic. You can tell that the film makers were not too afraid of showing things but still knew where the line was.2 out of 3.Starting with 1 (because), 1 + 2.5 + 2 + 2 = 7.5 I'm going to round to 8 because of showing detective work just being interviews, observation, and research. Not being just action, genius, and luck.
Scarecrow-88 Grim-faced Liam Neeson stars as a former NYC cop, unlicensed PI, and recovering alcoholic brought into a dangerous situation involving drug traffickers and the two one-time functionaries in the DEA who happened across their files while working for the government (in whatever capacity that seems undetermined) that extort from them (and kill their kidnapped loved ones after receipt of payment). Neeson's Matt Scudder is asked by a drug trafficker (Dan Stevens) to find the ones responsible for killing his wife, supposedly after he paid a ransom for her return (the body found in numerous pieces in bags). Matt met this trafficker's brother, Peter (Boyd Holbrook), at an addicts meeting, and their association has them eventually in a cat-and-mouse with psychopaths Ray and Albert (David Harbour and Adam David Thompson). Ray is gabby and full of wicked glee while Albert is subdued, cold, and detached…they live together, drive around in a white van, pursue the drug traffickers on the files they secured, build a kidnap plot, take their women, ask for ransom, and typically butcher those kidnapped, chopping up the bodies in their basement, and tossing off the bagged body parts in areas of their city. Scudder plans to find them and stop them. When a Russian trafficker's daughter is taken, Scudder will negotiate a meet-and-swap, but, of course, it all goes down violently.Provided a character with more meat on the bones than usual, Neeson morosely works the PI beat with a clever, intuitive mind and determined drive, befriending a discarded African-American youth named TJ (Astro) he tries to offer paternal and streetwise advice to so he can survive. A bullet to the eye of a little girl during a shootout with three grocery store hoods changed Scudder's life for good. This film has a subversive edge to it thanks to the two killers-kidnappers involved and Scudder's own journey to find them, often encountering all kinds of dangers along the way as the city offers its peril to him. The garrote shows up, as does the knife, taser, and gun, and there's plenty of unpleasantness Scudder must find his way through to get to the killers. As you might have guessed, the ending particularly is violent. Neeson, once again, carries the film, an anchor of surefootedness, ably convincing as this flawed man looking for redemption and absolution, perhaps getting his chance when a little girl is kidnapped. The shady characters opposite him aren't stereotypes, as the actors portraying them are given multi-faceted human beings using the drug trade as a means to live and thrive (the Russian has a bedridden invalid wife lost to the world he must take care of), but they aren't one-dimensional caricatures which is a plus in the film's favor. The dreary, crime-infested cityscape is quite a setting for Neeson's melancholy PI to work within. Ray and Albert are a creepy duo; one scene shows them sitting around a table eating breakfast while Ray comments that Y2K, listed on the front page of the newspaper, is not what the city should be worried about. A flashback involving a third partner of Ray and Albert's, for which Scudder questions, is certainly perhaps the most unsettling point in the movie.
lois-lane33 I thought this film was a surprise-a Liam Neeson film that had a whole bunch of bloopers in it that I missed completely the first time I saw it. A character gets killed in a shoot out in the park only to seemingly reappear minutes later (he looks almost identical to another actor) and a guy who has been obliterated by several shots fired at virtually point blank range is shown to have survived by wearing a bullet proof vest but a few minutes later is shown dying with the other guy who has just been killed very much alive standing beside Liam Neeson's character watching bullet proof vest guy die. Confusing. Then the bulletproof vest guy guy who has died in the park reappears minutes later injured in a van with his cohort. Whatever. I think the film has some good ideas which are obliterated by this lack of internal logic not at the very end but close to the very end-like they all of a sudden just up and gave up on the film. I think many films pass at first viewing but not at the second one where you are more apt to pick up on an errors in them and sometimes there are really big errors in the film that can really take away from the films appeal. The fact the film is about two off the charts bad guys doesn't change the fact it bombs because of flow errors. I think they made this film too fast.