TheLittleSongbird I did like this adaptation on the whole, but if I were to be honest, I prefer the Joan Hickson version, which I found more somewhat better paced and more stylish. But I will say it is a marginal improvement on the Helen Hayes version of They Do It With Mirrors. Overall, this is a pleasant enough time filler, however there are things wrong with it; the pacing has a tendency to become too sluggish, the events leading up to the final solution were rushed, the direction was too leisurely and one or two scenes and parts of the script came across as rather goofy. That said though, it sticks reasonably to the original story, updating it along the way. Helen Hayes makes for a rather cute Miss Marple, the soundtrack was good, the locations were very nice. Out of the supporting performances the standout, like a previous reviewer has mentioned, is Season Hubley as Molly, she was stunning. All in all, decent and pleasant, but not as good as the Hickson adaptation. 6/10 Bethany Cox

Iain-215 I came across an old video of this TV movie and watched it for the first time in about fifteen years. It is hopelessly trapped in 80s TV soap land with big hair and bright costumes and a 'steel band' soundtrack - its a bit like Christie meets Fantasy Island! Where does Helen Hayes' Miss Marple come from? Certainly not from Saint Marymead, England! However, the story stays remarkably faithful to the book (apart from the updating), Hayes' Marple (apart from the accent) is actually very engaging and there are some good supporting performances (I particularly liked the Rafiel ensemble and poor,lost Molly Kendall). There is no denying the superior quality of the (slightly) later BBC version with Joan Hickson but having watched that too recently, I was surprised to find that it does not beat this earlier version as conclusively as I would have thought.This is an intriguing oddity and worth a look if you come across it.

Charles Herold (cherold) This is a pretty poorly made TV movie typical of the early 80s, with an overly syrupy score and bland cinematography and awful acting by everyone under the age of 60. So it can be taken as proof of Agatha Christie's genius that a straightforward telling of one of her stories is pretty enjoyable even when done by hacks. The best part is watching the way Miss Marple manipulates the situation, pulling the strings of those around her while managing to seem harmless and perhaps dotty. In spite of her floating accent, Hayes makes an excellent Miss Marple, and Hughes and Evans are also quite good. The rest of the acting varies from mediocre to truly incompetent, but the story is strong enough to survive. The ending is unfortunately weak and feels as though it was rushed through, so the feeling of satisfaction one gets in a Christie book is sadly lacking, but overall it's pretty watchable, and I give it 6/10, which is about as much as you can give something filmed with the care of an episode of MacMillan and Wife.

simon70 Helen Hayes just doesn't cut it.Rather than going the whole hog and playing Miss Marple as an American, she plays her as an Englishwoman. This is a mistake,since her accent veers from deep south of USA to England via Ireland. In short, her accent is all over the place.Her lines are also peppered with Americanisms which no British person would ever say. Two examples:1) She refers to "tourist class" when British people call it "economy class".2) She says she's going to "mail" some postcards, when a genuinely British person say "post", not "mail".Two minor examples, I know, but they add to a general feeling that this Miss Marple is as British as a fudge brownie. All the references to her hometown of St. Mary Mead in England can't change that.Another point is that Santa Barbara is not in the slightest bit convincing as a stand-in for the Caribbean. The one shot of a caribbean town, Havana perhaps, is obviously grainy archive footage.Steer clear of this poorly made rubbish, and watch the BBC productions starring Joan Hickson instead.