Gray Fox It seems with the success of Fast and Furious movies comes the clones of them as well.This movie has a bad plot, bad automotive knowledge by the writers. But worst of all is the crash scenes.With the way C.G.I is these days they have no real excuse. The cars look less real than the cars in Gran Turismo 1.They look flat, with no reflections, gray headlights(so you cant see inside them).It is nothing but a cheap and nasty budget film.The only way i can see someone can watching this if they are quite drunk.

Antimyh182 Well.......WELL this movie was one of the worst films my eyes watched, to even call it a fast and furious rip off is to kind, the acting was god awful, script was a mess, the CGI was the worst of them all,although i like how the actors can instantly swap cars! one of the quotes are so bad i actually had to rewind because i couldn't stop laughing - think about this , "you can't shoot him they'll know it was a gun"please if you are ever going to do a crash scene actually crash the car constantly mistaking the model of the car and you are supposedly a top end mechanic?

Tim Kidner Sixty per cent of votes cast on IMDb (international movie database) for '200mph' were for a score of 1 out of ten.This was premiered on the SyFy channel...not sure what and how it's science fiction. I don't recall them ever showing Gone in Sixty Seconds...because that's the obvious comparative.It's straight to DVD and the Mazda RX7's and souped Nissan's are the only stars, adding humans sends things down the pan completely. I'm no car mechanic (Top Gear is about as close as I get) but I know that you should keep calling the same car model the same name and that you don't design a faster car (40mph extra, on top end) hammering keys on a laptop, whilst it's perched on the front wing of said car, say some magic words and hey presto! Everyone hi-fives and are delighted. The 'parts' get magically delivered for the next scene.The characters are either so stereotypical, such a chief mechanic being a young girl, in tank top and short shorts, who talks very fast, presuming to blind us with her non-sensical knowledge. Or, they're completely ridiculous. e.g. the young man who gets killed and thus the big race, as revenge, has a raggedy beard that's not trimmed or tidy and looks a bit of a tramp. He rolls home in this $80,000 top sports car, cos he's just been made manager of the franchise for the district and he can take home any car he wants. And his mother is a stripper. She is, I'm not making that one up...I tried to shut out all superfluous stuff other than the action. 160mph around L.A.? Well, very shaky cameras that obviously show the warp speed and sonic boom after, CGI and cut-editing and juddery this and that and everything.The soundtrack does its best to keep up and frankly, it's the best bit. I stopped watching it half way through. I'm due to retire in 20 odd years time and every moment is precious....Forget this one, unless you want to see the most utterly worse cop in history, all history, anywhere. Ever. He keeps up with the naughty boys and girls in an unmarked Ford saloon. 0/10.

Johnathon Mathews I am going to defend this movie; at least a little bit. It's yet another lower budget movie based on street racing, and lets face it no true gear head is ever happy with movies like this. Period. Knowing that this movie was a decent movie for the time, would i recommend you go out of your way to watch it? No, but if you have spare time go a head.Now to cover some of the things other reviewers have said...1. The Nissan in the movie was a 370z; not a 350z.2. The 370z costs $42,000 roughly in the form that it was in for the movie.3. The $90,000 car was the Nissan GT-R, not the 370z.4. They have always made the GT-R both left and right hand drive so having it as such is valid for whomever complained.Now, we all know movies are not true. The explosions we see are over done for special effects in action movies so why does it surprise you they stretch the truth for a car movie.