mifunesamurai Skolimowski challenges us once again, as he did in his earlier films, WALKOVER (1965) and BARRIER (1966). It was a pleasure to see him revert to those similar abstract styles, but with more of an edge that puts today's young filmmakers to shame.What works to the directors advantage is the cinema technology of today that enables him to tell his visual story at no big cost. How he can push those boundaries to great effect, utilizing the creative use of sound, the hypnotic cinematography, the brilliant music, and performances that were well restrained.The highlight is the non-linear story line, that jumps from various stories, at different times, eventually connecting them together for a stunning finale. And the meaning of it all? Leave that up to your own interpretation, and that is the pure enjoyment of it all.

adonis98-743-186503 A jealous husband out of control, his sexy actress wife, a sleazy Hollywood director, a reckless drug messenger, a disoriented young woman, an ex-con hot dog vendor, a troubled student on a mysterious mission, a high-rise window cleaner on an illicit break, an elderly sketch artist, a hectic paramedics team and a group of hungry nuns. A cross-section of contemporary urbanites whose lives and loves intertwine. They live in an unsure world where anything could happen at any time. An unexpected chain of events can seal many fates in a mere 11 minutes. My main problem with the film 11 Minutes is that it takes ideas from other films that took place around 20 or 30 minutes it also started with a woman filming threw her phone and it had once more the famous shaky cam that really annoyed me but overall it was better than other films that i saw today but that doesn't say much also the actors were mediocre nothing amazing about it.. (4.5/10)

yossarian100 Unfortunately, this is the type of movie that draws out all those filmmakers who want to weigh in on what the director did wrong. I'm not a filmmaker, so I just sat back and enjoyed this director's efforts.All the characters were interesting, and I particularly liked the director's decision to cut back and forth between the various players as the narrative moved forward. That choice requires a little more effort on our part, but it's well worth the effort.All in all, I had a great time, even if I did get most of my anxiety buttons pushed, but that's what happens when a film builds suspense slowly and relentlessly.If you're the type of person who enjoys most kinds of movies, then you'll enjoy the unusual approach they took with this one, and it has my most hearty recommendation.

euroGary Polish/Irish co-production 'Eleven Minutes' follows several characters over the course of eleven minutes in their lives - and straight away we run slap-bang into the film's main problem. Most eleven-minute segments of people's lives are mundane and dull, and so, for some of the characters, is the case here: the woman walking her dog; the couple watching pornography in an illicitly-occupied hotel room. But by contrast, other characters pack an awful lot into their allotted time: the teenager who gets ignored by his mother, robs a pawnshop and finds a dead body inside; or the motorcycle courier who escapes from his lover's husband, gets involved in a police chase, trips out and then goes to meet his father - all this in just eleven minutes? Really?Also not helping is director Jerzy Skolimowski's decision to intercut between the characters, which gives an impression of more time passing in the story than is actually the case. Exclusively following one character to the end of his/her story, then another, then another, might have given a greater feeling of urgency. And the way the different characters' stories come together at the end is either skillfully done, or utterly contrived, depending on what mood the viewer is in at the time!Skolimowski's career goes back to the sixties. To say this film sees him coasting on his reputation would be cruel, but I can't help wondering if the London Film Festival luminary who introduced it would have been quite so gushing had the director been a first-timer.