10,000 Days

2014
10,000 Days
2.7| 1h31m| en| More Info
Released: 23 November 2014 Released
Producted By: Bahr Productions Inc.
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

10,000 Days ago, Comet 23 struck Earth with the magnitude of all the nuclear weapons in the world sending the planet into a deep freeze. Now, 27 years in the future, those who survived are locked in an epic battle of life or death.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Bahr Productions Inc.

Trailers & Images

Reviews

angelav-44055 This has got to be close to one of the worse films I have ever seen and could not cope with watching all of it as it was so bad. It could have been so much better as the base storyline is not too bad. The script was very dull and amateur and the characters very weak, how it ever got released is a mystery to me.Disjointed scenes all over the place jumped from one subject to another. I left watching it to do ironing which I hate but it was better than having to watch the rest of this film.Don't waste your time watching it go do something more entertaining. If this film made any money I would be surprised.
mjcarter73 Well this is a very poor movie. The story revolves around a new ice age following cometary impact and the scenario has two themes. A romeo and Juliet situation and whether the world will warm up. The latter has two options either a natural event or a deliberate intervention using nuclear weapons, access to which the survivors acquire through their discovery of air force one. However none of this is resolved, the lovers are still in warring families, the nucs are never launched but still threaten and two young people set off to find a warmer land walking right out of the script. This is one of those stories where the writer has envisaged a situation but really has no idea what could happen to make it interesting. The movie simply ends in the middle resolving nothing. I see another reviewer threatens a sequel... I don't think so because I think they simply ran out of ideas. In my opinion Movies that don't have a start a story and an end should simply never be made. Sadly this one was and as a viewer I feel cheated.
Georgia Reviewer Don't waste your time with this stinker. Even John Scheider (of Dukes of Hazzard fame) can't save this film. I've heard better dialog and voice acting in high school plays.I can't think of anything good to say, other than it had potential, but completely wasted it. Worse, it ends suddenly just as something is finally about to happen. (I was told this was episode 1 of a TV series?).Dozens of plot holes and science/fact errors. A couple of semi-cute ladies (bundled up, sadly). Fake snow. Story involves a sudden ice age, a frozen Air Force One, flashlights powered by blood, awfully choreographed "fight" scenes, idiots who miraculously can make 50-year old frozen electronics work, and much other nonsense. Verdict: 2 stars, barely. I've seen worse, but not often.
gnmartins What to say about this movie? It is awful! I could say more about the acting, special effects, story, but I prefer to let you read the nabokov95 review. He gave me some minutes of fun after this waste of time, so I recommend you go just after my review. His review should be just after mine.I came to IMDb after watching the movie, just because I couldn't believe that a film so bad like this could ever end like it have: suggesting that will be continued. I truly don't recommend that you see this film, but if do, don't forget to have your 2 minutes of fun reading what nabokov95 wrote about it. He entitled as "Rats can't vomit".